PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGM vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGM vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGM achieves a 31.32% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's 2.78% return. Over the past 10 years, IGM has outperformed SLV with an annualized return of 25.19%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively lower 15.55% annualized return.


IGM

1D
-0.84%
1M
16.93%
YTD
31.32%
6M
29.19%
1Y
62.26%
3Y*
39.18%
5Y*
22.04%
10Y*
25.19%

SLV

1D
-2.62%
1M
0.41%
YTD
2.78%
6M
24.76%
1Y
110.59%
3Y*
45.06%
5Y*
20.76%
10Y*
15.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGM vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IGM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
31.32%26.76%36.99%60.68%-35.83%25.72%45.11%41.81%2.26%37.20%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
2.78%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%47.30%14.88%-9.19%5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between IGM and SLV is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2006

0.18

IGM vs. SLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IGM
SLV

Technology

82.8%

-

Communication Services

16.8%

-

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Industrials

0.2%

-

Energy

0.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

100.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

IGM
82.8%
SLV

-

Communication Services

IGM
16.8%
SLV

-

Financial Services

IGM
0.2%
SLV

-

Industrials

IGM
0.2%
SLV

-

Energy

IGM
0.1%
SLV

-

Consumer Cyclical

IGM
0.1%
SLV

-

Basic Materials

IGM

-

SLV
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

IGM

-

SLV

-

Healthcare

IGM

-

SLV

-

Real Estate

IGM

-

SLV

-

Utilities

IGM

-

SLV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGM vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGM
IGM Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
IGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGM Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGM Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGM vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGMSLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.35

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.81

2.62

+1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.36

5.64

+7.71

IGM vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGM Sharpe Ratio is 3.07, which is higher than the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGM and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGMSLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.07

1.89

+1.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.58

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.03

0.49

+0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.25

+0.24

Drawdowns

IGM vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGM drawdown since its inception was -65.59%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGM and SLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGMSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.59%

-76.28%

+10.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.44%

-42.45%

+26.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.39%

-42.45%

+16.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.68%

-42.45%

+1.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.68%

-42.81%

+2.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-37.30%

+36.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.23%

-44.67%

+29.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.67%

19.67%

-15.00%

Volatility

IGM vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) is 6.10%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.30%. This indicates that IGM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGMSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.10%

16.30%

-10.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.08%

58.31%

-42.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.43%

58.90%

-38.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.68%

36.15%

-10.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.54%

31.84%

-7.30%

IGM vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGM has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGM vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

IGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGM
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
0.12%0.17%0.22%0.33%0.66%0.16%0.32%0.50%0.57%0.57%0.90%0.79%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGM and SLV have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to IGM (6.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGM dropped -65.59% vs SLV's -76.28%.

On 10-year performance, IGM leads with 25.19% vs 15.55% for SLV. On fees, IGM is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, IGM has been the lower-risk option at 6.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IGM has performed better with a 25.19% return vs 15.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGM is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.

IGM has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

IGM is categorized as Technology Equities, while SLV is Silver. IGM tracks S&P North American Technology Sector Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IGM and 0.50% for SLV.

IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGM and SLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer