IGM vs. SLV
IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - IGM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Technology Sector Index, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGM returned 25.19%/yr vs 15.55%/yr for SLV. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IGM charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.
Performance
IGM vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGM achieves a 31.32% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's 2.78% return. Over the past 10 years, IGM has outperformed SLV with an annualized return of 25.19%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively lower 15.55% annualized return.
IGM
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 16.93%
- YTD
- 31.32%
- 6M
- 29.19%
- 1Y
- 62.26%
- 3Y*
- 39.18%
- 5Y*
- 22.04%
- 10Y*
- 25.19%
SLV
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 24.76%
- 1Y
- 110.59%
- 3Y*
- 45.06%
- 5Y*
- 20.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.55%
IGM vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 31.32% | 26.76% | 36.99% | 60.68% | -35.83% | 25.72% | 45.11% | 41.81% | 2.26% | 37.20% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 2.78% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGM and SLV is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2006 | 0.18 |
IGM vs. SLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGM
SLV
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
IGM
SLV
-
Communication Services
IGM
SLV
-
Financial Services
IGM
SLV
-
Industrials
IGM
SLV
-
Energy
IGM
SLV
-
Consumer Cyclical
IGM
SLV
-
Basic Materials
IGM
-
SLV
Consumer Defensive
IGM
-
SLV
-
Healthcare
IGM
-
SLV
-
Real Estate
IGM
-
SLV
-
Utilities
IGM
-
SLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGM vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
IGM
SLV
IGM vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGM | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.35 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.81 | 2.62 | +1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.36 | 5.64 | +7.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGM | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.07 | 1.89 | +1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.58 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.03 | 0.49 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.25 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
IGM vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGM drawdown since its inception was -65.59%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGM and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGM | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.59% | -76.28% | +10.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.44% | -42.45% | +26.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.39% | -42.45% | +16.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.68% | -42.45% | +1.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.68% | -42.81% | +2.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -37.30% | +36.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.23% | -44.67% | +29.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.67% | 19.67% | -15.00% |
Volatility
IGM vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) is 6.10%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.30%. This indicates that IGM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGM | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.10% | 16.30% | -10.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.08% | 58.31% | -42.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.43% | 58.90% | -38.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.68% | 36.15% | -10.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.54% | 31.84% | -7.30% |
IGM vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGM has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGM vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
IGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 0.12% | 0.17% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.66% | 0.16% | 0.32% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.90% | 0.79% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGM and SLV have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to IGM (6.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGM dropped -65.59% vs SLV's -76.28%.
On 10-year performance, IGM leads with 25.19% vs 15.55% for SLV. On fees, IGM is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, IGM has been the lower-risk option at 6.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IGM has performed better with a 25.19% return vs 15.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGM is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.
IGM has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
IGM is categorized as Technology Equities, while SLV is Silver. IGM tracks S&P North American Technology Sector Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IGM and 0.50% for SLV.
IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGM and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer