IGM vs. OILK

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IGM returned 22.04%/yr vs 17.73%/yr for OILK. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IGM charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.

Performance

IGM vs. OILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGM achieves a 31.32% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.

IGM

• 1D: -0.84%
• 1M: 16.93%
• YTD: 31.32%
• 6M: 29.19%
• 1Y: 62.26%
• 3Y*: 39.18%
• 5Y*: 22.04%
• 10Y*: 25.19%

OILK

• 1D: 1.40%
• 1M: -1.65%
• YTD: 64.22%
• 6M: 60.70%
• 1Y: 58.99%
• 3Y*: 19.03%
• 5Y*: 17.73%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGM vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF	31.32%	26.76%	36.99%	60.68%	-35.83%	25.72%	45.11%	41.81%	2.26%	37.20%
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF	64.22%	-11.86%	8.18%	-0.97%	27.57%	63.71%	-61.09%	30.48%	-20.40%	2.82%

Correlation

The correlation between IGM and OILK is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.02
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2016	0.13

The correlation between IGM and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IGM vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IGM	OILK
Technology	82.8%	-
Communication Services	16.8%	-
Financial Services	0.2%	-
Industrials	0.2%	-
Energy	0.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.1%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

IGM vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGM

IGM Risk / Return Rank: 79
IGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
IGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
IGM Omega Ratio Rank: 81
IGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
IGM Martin Ratio Rank: 70

OILK

OILK Risk / Return Rank: 55
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 54
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGM vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IGM	OILK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.07	2.06	+1.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.78	2.59	+1.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.34	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.81	3.42	+0.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.36	6.91	+6.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IGM vs. OILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGM Sharpe Ratio is 3.07, which is higher than the OILK Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGM and OILK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IGM	OILK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.07	2.06	+1.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86	0.59	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.03	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.12	+0.37

Drawdowns

IGM vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGM drawdown since its inception was -65.59%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGM and OILK.

Drawdown Indicators

	IGM	OILK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.59%	-83.76%	+18.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.44%	-17.35%	+0.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.39%	-23.42%	-2.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.68%	-34.69%	-5.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.84%	-3.66%	+2.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.23%	-32.61%	+17.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.67%	8.56%	-3.89%

Volatility

IGM vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) is 6.10%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that IGM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IGM	OILK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.10%	10.44%	-4.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.08%	23.26%	-7.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.43%	28.75%	-8.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.68%	30.12%	-4.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.54%	35.97%	-11.43%

IGM vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

IGM vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison

IGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF	0.12%	0.17%	0.22%	0.33%	0.66%	0.16%	0.32%	0.50%	0.57%	0.57%	0.90%	0.79%
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF	8.18%	4.79%	3.11%	5.80%	17.32%	68.82%	0.13%	0.94%	0.58%	6.17%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IGM and OILK in my portfolio?

IGM and OILK have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IGM or OILK?

OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to IGM (6.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGM dropped -65.59% vs OILK's -83.76%.

Which ETF is better, IGM or OILK?

On 5-year performance, IGM leads with 22.04% vs 17.73% for OILK. On fees, IGM is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IGM has been the lower-risk option at 6.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IGM or OILK?

Over the 5-year period, IGM has performed better with a 22.04% return vs 17.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IGM or OILK?

IGM is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IGM or OILK?

OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.12% for IGM.

What is the main difference between IGM and OILK?

IGM is categorized as Technology Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. IGM tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGM and 0.68% for OILK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.