IGM vs. KROP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) and KROP (Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - IGM tracks the S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index while KROP tracks the Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IGM returned 35.67%/yr vs -1.05%/yr for KROP. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IGM charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for KROP.

Performance

IGM vs. KROP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGM achieves a 22.65% return, which is significantly higher than KROP's 11.60% return.

IGM

• 1D: -3.56%
• 1M: 0.74%
• YTD: 22.65%
• 6M: 21.02%
• 1Y: 47.83%
• 3Y*: 35.67%
• 5Y*: 19.25%
• 10Y*: 24.86%

KROP

• 1D: -1.01%
• 1M: -1.85%
• YTD: 11.60%
• 6M: 11.45%
• 1Y: 7.63%
• 3Y*: -1.05%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGM vs. KROP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF	22.65%	26.76%	36.99%	60.68%	-35.83%	6.46%
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	11.60%	7.95%	-8.74%	-23.86%	-27.23%	-19.99%

Correlation

The correlation between IGM and KROP is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2021	0.44

Over the past year, the correlation between IGM and KROP has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IGM vs. KROP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IGM	KROP
Technology	84.5%	-
Communication Services	14.4%	-
Industrials	0.3%	40.4%
Financial Services	0.3%	-
Energy	0.2%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.0%	0.3%
Basic Materials	0.0%	32.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	27.1%
Healthcare	-	0.3%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

IGM vs. KROP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGM

IGM Risk / Return Rank: 61
IGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
IGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
IGM Omega Ratio Rank: 60
IGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
IGM Martin Ratio Rank: 57

KROP

KROP Risk / Return Rank: 16
KROP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
KROP Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
KROP Omega Ratio Rank: 15
KROP Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
KROP Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGM vs. KROP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IGM	KROP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	0.47	+1.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.67	0.79	+1.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.10	+0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.92	0.68	+2.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.77	1.46	+8.31

IGM vs. KROP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGM Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is higher than the KROP Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGM and KROP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IGM vs. KROP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGM drawdown since its inception was -65.59%, which is greater than KROP's maximum drawdown of -62.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGM and KROP.

Drawdown Indicators

	IGM	KROP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-65.59%	-62.08%	-3.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.44%	-11.29%	-5.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.39%	-28.70%	+2.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.68%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.39%	-51.27%	+43.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.21%	-44.71%	+29.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.91%	5.23%	-0.32%

Volatility

IGM vs. KROP - Volatility Comparison

iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) has a higher volatility of 11.53% compared to Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) at 4.54%. This indicates that IGM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KROP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IGM	KROP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.53%	4.54%	+6.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.67%	12.48%	+6.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.76%	16.19%	+6.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.07%	22.23%	+3.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.71%	22.23%	+2.48%

IGM vs. KROP - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than KROP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

IGM vs. KROP - Dividend Comparison

IGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than KROP's 2.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF	0.14%	0.17%	0.22%	0.33%	0.66%	0.16%	0.32%	0.50%	0.57%	0.57%	0.90%	0.79%
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	2.45%	2.73%	1.89%	1.36%	0.71%	0.69%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IGM and KROP in my portfolio?

IGM and KROP have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IGM or KROP?

IGM has higher volatility (11.53%) compared to KROP (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGM dropped -65.59% vs KROP's -62.08%.

Which ETF is better, IGM or KROP?

On 3-year performance, IGM leads with 35.67% vs -1.05% for KROP. On fees, IGM is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, KROP has been the lower-risk option at 4.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IGM or KROP?

Over the 3-year period, IGM has performed better with a 35.67% return vs -1.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IGM or KROP?

IGM is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KROP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IGM or KROP?

KROP has the higher dividend yield at 2.45%, compared with 0.14% for IGM.

What is the main difference between IGM and KROP?

IGM tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index, while KROP tracks Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGM and 0.50% for KROP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.