IGM vs. KCE
IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) and KCE (SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index, while KCE is a Financials Equities fund tracking the S&P Capital Markets Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGM returned 24.57%/yr vs 17.65%/yr for KCE. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IGM charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for KCE.
Performance
IGM vs. KCE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGM achieves a 23.42% return, which is significantly higher than KCE's 3.66% return. Over the past 10 years, IGM has outperformed KCE with an annualized return of 24.57%, while KCE has yielded a comparatively lower 17.65% annualized return.
IGM
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- YTD
- 23.42%
- 6M
- 23.24%
- 1Y
- 48.57%
- 3Y*
- 35.37%
- 5Y*
- 20.09%
- 10Y*
- 24.57%
KCE
- 1D
- 1.60%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- YTD
- 3.66%
- 6M
- 2.73%
- 1Y
- 14.27%
- 3Y*
- 24.58%
- 5Y*
- 12.87%
- 10Y*
- 17.65%
IGM vs. KCE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 23.42% | 26.76% | 36.99% | 60.68% | -35.83% | 25.72% | 45.11% | 41.81% | 2.26% | 37.20% |
KCE SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF | 3.66% | 10.76% | 37.51% | 32.04% | -22.14% | 40.05% | 30.82% | 27.13% | -15.63% | 32.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGM and KCE is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2005 | 0.70 |
The correlation between IGM and KCE shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IGM vs. KCE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGM
KCE
Technology
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
IGM
KCE
Communication Services
IGM
KCE
-
Financial Services
IGM
KCE
Industrials
IGM
KCE
-
Energy
IGM
KCE
-
Consumer Cyclical
IGM
KCE
-
Basic Materials
IGM
-
KCE
-
Consumer Defensive
IGM
-
KCE
-
Healthcare
IGM
-
KCE
-
Real Estate
IGM
-
KCE
-
Utilities
IGM
-
KCE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGM vs. KCE — Risk / Return Rank
IGM
KCE
IGM vs. KCE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) and SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGM | KCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.13 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | 0.82 | +2.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.06 | 2.14 | +7.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGM vs. KCE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGM drawdown since its inception was -65.59%, smaller than the maximum KCE drawdown of -74.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGM and KCE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGM | KCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.59% | -74.00% | +8.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.44% | -17.44% | +1.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.39% | -26.31% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.68% | -34.45% | -6.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.68% | -40.78% | +0.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.80% | -3.75% | -3.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.22% | -22.78% | +7.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.84% | 6.70% | -1.86% |
Volatility
IGM vs. KCE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) has a higher volatility of 10.03% compared to SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF (KCE) at 6.04%. This indicates that IGM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KCE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGM | KCE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.03% | 6.04% | +3.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.11% | 15.31% | +2.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.98% | 20.12% | +1.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.91% | 23.08% | +2.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.66% | 23.10% | +1.56% |
IGM vs. KCE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than KCE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGM vs. KCE - Dividend Comparison
IGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than KCE's 1.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.66% | 0.16% | 0.32% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.90% | 0.79% |
KCE SPDR S&P Capital Markets ETF | 1.67% | 1.63% | 1.56% | 1.82% | 2.42% | 1.53% | 2.20% | 2.32% | 2.67% | 1.95% | 2.30% | 2.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGM and KCE have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGM has higher volatility (10.03%) compared to KCE (6.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGM dropped -65.59% vs KCE's -74.00%.
On 10-year performance, IGM leads with 24.57% vs 17.65% for KCE. On fees, KCE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, KCE has been the lower-risk option at 6.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IGM has performed better with a 24.57% return vs 17.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KCE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGM.
KCE has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.13% for IGM.
IGM is categorized as Technology Equities, while KCE is Financials Equities. IGM tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index, while KCE tracks S&P Capital Markets Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGM and 0.35% for KCE.
IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGM and KCE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer