IGM vs. IOO
IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) and IOO (iShares Global 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index, while IOO is a Global Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 100 Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGM returned 25.12%/yr vs 16.76%/yr for IOO. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IGM charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IOO.
Performance
IGM vs. IOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGM achieves a 27.92% return, which is significantly higher than IOO's 10.84% return. Over the past 10 years, IGM has outperformed IOO with an annualized return of 25.12%, while IOO has yielded a comparatively lower 16.76% annualized return.
IGM
- 1D
- 3.64%
- 1M
- 7.10%
- YTD
- 27.92%
- 6M
- 29.29%
- 1Y
- 56.16%
- 3Y*
- 36.48%
- 5Y*
- 20.96%
- 10Y*
- 25.12%
IOO
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- YTD
- 10.84%
- 6M
- 12.35%
- 1Y
- 35.77%
- 3Y*
- 23.86%
- 5Y*
- 16.22%
- 10Y*
- 16.76%
IGM vs. IOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 27.92% | 26.76% | 36.99% | 60.68% | -35.83% | 25.72% | 45.11% | 41.81% | 2.26% | 37.20% |
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF | 10.84% | 27.02% | 26.54% | 27.71% | -16.34% | 26.03% | 18.61% | 30.01% | -6.22% | 23.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGM and IOO is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2001 | 0.81 |
The correlation between IGM and IOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
IGM vs. IOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IGM
IOO
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
IGM
IOO
Communication Services
IGM
IOO
Industrials
IGM
IOO
Financial Services
IGM
IOO
Energy
IGM
IOO
Consumer Cyclical
IGM
IOO
Basic Materials
IGM
-
IOO
Consumer Defensive
IGM
-
IOO
Healthcare
IGM
-
IOO
Real Estate
IGM
-
IOO
Utilities
IGM
-
IOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGM vs. IOO — Risk / Return Rank
IGM
IOO
IGM vs. IOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) and iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGM | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.45 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.43 | 3.62 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.62 | 16.01 | -4.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGM vs. IOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGM drawdown since its inception was -65.59%, which is greater than IOO's maximum drawdown of -55.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGM and IOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGM | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.59% | -55.85% | -9.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.44% | -9.94% | -6.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.39% | -19.19% | -7.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.68% | -23.52% | -17.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.68% | -31.43% | -9.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.41% | -2.57% | -0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.22% | -11.26% | -3.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.85% | 2.24% | +2.61% |
Volatility
IGM vs. IOO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) has a higher volatility of 10.54% compared to iShares Global 100 ETF (IOO) at 5.00%. This indicates that IGM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGM | IOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.54% | 5.00% | +5.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.42% | 11.40% | +7.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.24% | 14.10% | +8.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.97% | 17.14% | +8.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.70% | 17.81% | +6.89% |
IGM vs. IOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than IOO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGM vs. IOO - Dividend Comparison
IGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than IOO's 1.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 0.17% | 0.17% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.66% | 0.16% | 0.32% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.90% | 0.79% |
IOO iShares Global 100 ETF | 1.35% | 0.92% | 1.08% | 1.49% | 2.00% | 1.53% | 1.49% | 2.02% | 2.54% | 2.23% | 2.75% | 2.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGM and IOO have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGM has higher volatility (10.54%) compared to IOO (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGM dropped -65.59% vs IOO's -55.85%.
On 10-year performance, IGM leads with 25.12% vs 16.76% for IOO. On fees, IGM is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IOO has been the lower-risk option at 5.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IGM has performed better with a 25.12% return vs 16.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGM is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IOO.
IOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.17% for IGM.
IGM is categorized as Technology Equities, while IOO is Global Equities. IGM tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index, while IOO tracks S&P Global 100 Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGM and 0.40% for IOO.
IOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGM and IOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer