IGM vs. IAU
IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) and IAU (iShares Gold Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - IGM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index, while IAU is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGM returned 24.86%/yr vs 11.76%/yr for IAU. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IGM charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IAU.
Performance
IGM vs. IAU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGM achieves a 22.65% return, which is significantly higher than IAU's -4.73% return. Over the past 10 years, IGM has outperformed IAU with an annualized return of 24.86%, while IAU has yielded a comparatively lower 11.76% annualized return.
IGM
- 1D
- -3.56%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 22.65%
- 6M
- 21.02%
- 1Y
- 47.83%
- 3Y*
- 35.67%
- 5Y*
- 19.25%
- 10Y*
- 24.86%
IAU
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- -8.82%
- YTD
- -4.73%
- 6M
- -8.68%
- 1Y
- 21.45%
- 3Y*
- 28.61%
- 5Y*
- 18.02%
- 10Y*
- 11.76%
IGM vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 22.65% | 26.76% | 36.99% | 60.68% | -35.83% | 25.72% | 45.11% | 41.81% | 2.26% | 37.20% |
IAU iShares Gold Trust | -4.73% | 63.95% | 26.85% | 12.84% | -0.63% | -4.00% | 25.03% | 17.98% | -1.76% | 12.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGM and IAU is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2005 | 0.05 |
The correlation between IGM and IAU shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGM vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank
IGM
IAU
IGM vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGM | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.17 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 0.88 | +2.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.77 | 2.37 | +7.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGM vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGM drawdown since its inception was -65.59%, which is greater than IAU's maximum drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGM and IAU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGM | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.59% | -45.14% | -20.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.44% | -24.40% | +7.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.39% | -24.40% | -1.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.68% | -24.40% | -16.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.68% | -24.40% | -16.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.39% | -23.87% | +16.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.21% | -15.97% | +0.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.91% | 9.07% | -4.16% |
Volatility
IGM vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison
iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) has a higher volatility of 11.53% compared to iShares Gold Trust (IAU) at 8.10%. This indicates that IGM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGM | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.53% | 8.10% | +3.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.67% | 24.23% | -5.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.76% | 27.38% | -4.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.07% | 18.18% | +7.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.71% | 15.98% | +8.73% |
IGM vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
IGM vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison
IGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, while IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAU iShares Gold Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 0.14% | 0.17% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.66% | 0.16% | 0.32% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.90% | 0.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGM and IAU have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGM has higher volatility (11.53%) compared to IAU (8.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGM dropped -65.59% vs IAU's -45.14%.
On 10-year performance, IGM leads with 24.86% vs 11.76% for IAU. On fees, IAU is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IAU has been the lower-risk option at 8.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IGM has performed better with a 24.86% return vs 11.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IAU is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for IGM.
IGM has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.00% for IAU.
IGM is categorized as Technology Equities, while IAU is Gold. IGM tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index, while IAU tracks LBMA Gold Price. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IGM and 0.25% for IAU.
IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGM and IAU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer