IGLT.L vs. TRIS.L
IGLT.L (iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF) and TRIS.L (Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF Dist) are both Government Bonds funds - IGLT.L tracks the FTSE Actuaries UK Conventional Gilts All Stocks Index while TRIS.L tracks the Bloomberg US Treasury Coupons Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IGLT.L returned -4.26%/yr vs 4.36%/yr for TRIS.L. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. IGLT.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for TRIS.L.
Performance
IGLT.L vs. TRIS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IGLT.L is traded in GBP, while TRIS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the TRIS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGLT.L achieves a -0.84% return, which is significantly lower than TRIS.L's 1.60% return.
IGLT.L
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- YTD
- -0.84%
- 6M
- -1.14%
- 1Y
- 2.10%
- 3Y*
- 2.44%
- 5Y*
- -4.26%
- 10Y*
- -0.90%
TRIS.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 1.33%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 1.14%
- 1Y
- 4.90%
- 3Y*
- 2.01%
- 5Y*
- 4.36%
- 10Y*
- —
IGLT.L vs. TRIS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGLT.L iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF | -0.84% | 4.69% | -3.33% | 3.56% | -23.71% | -5.03% | 4.64% |
TRIS.L Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF Dist | 1.60% | -2.79% | 6.84% | -0.75% | 12.57% | 1.25% | -3.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGLT.L and TRIS.L is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2020 | -0.06 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between IGLT.L and TRIS.L has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.06 to -0.33, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGLT.L vs. TRIS.L — Risk / Return Rank
IGLT.L
TRIS.L
IGLT.L vs. TRIS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF (IGLT.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TRIS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGLT.L | TRIS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.13 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.40 | 1.09 | -0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.07 | 2.75 | -1.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGLT.L | TRIS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 | 0.76 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.42 | 0.52 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.26 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
IGLT.L vs. TRIS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGLT.L drawdown since its inception was -35.52%, which is greater than TRIS.L's maximum drawdown of -18.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLT.L and TRIS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGLT.L | TRIS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.52% | -18.99% | -16.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.24% | -4.49% | -0.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.97% | -9.71% | +2.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.49% | -15.37% | -18.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.96% | -5.66% | -20.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.26% | -9.81% | +1.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 1.78% | +0.19% |
Volatility
IGLT.L vs. TRIS.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF (IGLT.L) has a higher volatility of 2.31% compared to Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TRIS.L) at 2.02%. This indicates that IGLT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRIS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGLT.L | TRIS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.31% | 2.02% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.73% | 4.71% | +0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.00% | 6.45% | -0.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.02% | 8.34% | +1.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.02% | 8.80% | +0.22% |
IGLT.L vs. TRIS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGLT.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than TRIS.L's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IGLT.L vs. TRIS.L - Dividend Comparison
IGLT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, more than TRIS.L's 4.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGLT.L iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF | 4.50% | 4.26% | 3.69% | 2.40% | 1.32% | 0.79% | 0.95% | 1.25% | 1.31% | 1.30% | 1.88% | 2.05% |
TRIS.L Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF Dist | 4.01% | 4.26% | 4.87% | 4.68% | 1.52% | 0.10% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGLT.L and TRIS.L have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRIS.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRIS.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IGLT.L.
IGLT.L tracks FTSE Actuaries UK Conventional Gilts All Stocks Index, while TRIS.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Coupons Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IGLT.L and 0.06% for TRIS.L.
Find the right allocation for IGLT.L and TRIS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer