IGLT.L vs. TREI.L
IGLT.L (iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF) and TREI.L (Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Government Bonds funds - IGLT.L tracks the FTSE Actuaries UK Conventional Gilts All Stocks Index while TREI.L tracks the Bloomberg US Treasury Coupons Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IGLT.L returned -4.97%/yr vs 4.00%/yr for TREI.L. Their -0.04 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. IGLT.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for TREI.L.
Performance
IGLT.L vs. TREI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IGLT.L is traded in GBP, while TREI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TREI.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGLT.L achieves a -1.10% return, which is significantly lower than TREI.L's 3.04% return.
IGLT.L
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -1.84%
- 6M
- -1.40%
- YTD
- -1.10%
- 1Y
- 1.89%
- 3Y*
- 2.17%
- 5Y*
- -4.97%
- 10Y*
- -1.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.25%
TREI.L
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -0.66%
- 6M
- 4.13%
- YTD
- 3.04%
- 1Y
- 4.74%
- 3Y*
- 3.52%
- 5Y*
- 4.00%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.41%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| £3.50M | £6.04M | £5.78M | |
| £37.40K | £53.08K | £29.48K |
IGLT.L vs. TREI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGLT.L iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF | -1.10% | 4.70% | -3.34% | 3.61% | -23.74% | -5.00% | 6.21% |
TREI.L Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 3.04% | -3.12% | 7.01% | -0.27% | 12.48% | 0.92% | -3.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGLT.L and TREI.L is -0.21, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2020 | -0.04 |
The correlation between IGLT.L and TREI.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to -0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGLT.L vs. TREI.L — Risk / Return Rank
IGLT.L
TREI.L
IGLT.L vs. TREI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF (IGLT.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TREI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGLT.L | TREI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.14 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.28 | 1.04 | -0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.76 | 2.83 | -2.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGLT.L vs. TREI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGLT.L drawdown since its inception was -35.56%, which is greater than TREI.L's maximum drawdown of -19.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLT.L and TREI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGLT.L | TREI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.56% | -19.00% | -16.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.00% | -5.11% | -0.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.96% | -9.81% | +2.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.53% | -15.98% | -17.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.15% | -5.08% | -21.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.51% | -10.04% | +1.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 1.89% | +0.30% |
Volatility
IGLT.L vs. TREI.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF (IGLT.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (TREI.L) have volatilities of 1.68% and 1.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGLT.L | TREI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.68% | 1.69% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.14% | 5.02% | +1.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.94% | 6.65% | +0.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.31% | 8.41% | +1.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.13% | 8.77% | +0.36% |
IGLT.L vs. TREI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGLT.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than TREI.L's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IGLT.L vs. TREI.L - Dividend Comparison
IGLT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than TREI.L's 3.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGLT.L iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF | 4.51% | 4.26% | 3.69% | 2.40% | 1.32% | 0.79% | 0.95% | 1.24% | 1.31% | 1.30% | 1.88% | 2.05% |
TREI.L Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 3.92% | 4.23% | 4.98% | 4.59% | 1.51% | 0.10% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGLT.L and TREI.L have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TREI.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TREI.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IGLT.L.
IGLT.L tracks FTSE Actuaries UK Conventional Gilts All Stocks Index, while TREI.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Coupons Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IGLT.L and 0.06% for TREI.L.
Find the right allocation for IGLT.L and TREI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer