IGLT.L vs. COMM.L
IGLT.L (iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF) and COMM.L (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGLT.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Actuaries UK Conventional Gilts All Stocks Index, while COMM.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IGLT.L returned -4.26%/yr vs 12.23%/yr for COMM.L. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. IGLT.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for COMM.L.
Performance
IGLT.L vs. COMM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IGLT.L is traded in GBP, while COMM.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the COMM.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGLT.L achieves a -0.84% return, which is significantly lower than COMM.L's 24.65% return.
IGLT.L
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- YTD
- -0.84%
- 6M
- -1.14%
- 1Y
- 2.10%
- 3Y*
- 2.44%
- 5Y*
- -4.26%
- 10Y*
- -0.90%
COMM.L
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- -2.81%
- YTD
- 24.65%
- 6M
- 23.36%
- 1Y
- 38.99%
- 3Y*
- 12.58%
- 5Y*
- 12.23%
- 10Y*
- —
IGLT.L vs. COMM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGLT.L iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF | -0.84% | 4.69% | -3.33% | 3.56% | -23.71% | -5.03% | 8.08% | 6.70% | 0.53% | -0.19% |
COMM.L iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 24.65% | 8.53% | 6.19% | -12.55% | 28.34% | 29.04% | -7.09% | 2.79% | -4.51% | 0.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGLT.L and COMM.L is -0.41, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2017 | -0.07 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between IGLT.L and COMM.L has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.07 to -0.41, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGLT.L vs. COMM.L — Risk / Return Rank
IGLT.L
COMM.L
IGLT.L vs. COMM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF (IGLT.L) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (COMM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGLT.L | COMM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.38 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.40 | 5.18 | -4.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.07 | 11.78 | -10.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGLT.L | COMM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 | 2.09 | -1.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.42 | 0.74 | -1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.51 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
IGLT.L vs. COMM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGLT.L drawdown since its inception was -35.52%, which is greater than COMM.L's maximum drawdown of -28.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLT.L and COMM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGLT.L | COMM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.52% | -28.49% | -7.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.24% | -7.49% | +2.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.97% | -14.73% | +7.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.49% | -28.49% | -5.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.96% | -5.17% | -20.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.26% | -12.15% | +3.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 3.30% | -1.33% |
Volatility
IGLT.L vs. COMM.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF (IGLT.L) is 2.31%, while iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (COMM.L) has a volatility of 6.19%. This indicates that IGLT.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGLT.L | COMM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.31% | 6.19% | -3.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.73% | 16.45% | -11.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.00% | 18.59% | -12.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.02% | 16.51% | -6.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.02% | 15.38% | -6.36% |
IGLT.L vs. COMM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGLT.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than COMM.L's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IGLT.L vs. COMM.L - Dividend Comparison
IGLT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, while COMM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMM.L iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IGLT.L iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF | 4.50% | 4.26% | 3.69% | 2.40% | 1.32% | 0.79% | 0.95% | 1.25% | 1.31% | 1.30% | 1.88% | 2.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGLT.L and COMM.L have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IGLT.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IGLT.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for COMM.L.
IGLT.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while COMM.L is Commodities. IGLT.L tracks FTSE Actuaries UK Conventional Gilts All Stocks Index, while COMM.L tracks Bloomberg Commodity. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IGLT.L and 0.19% for COMM.L.
Find the right allocation for IGLT.L and COMM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer