IGLT.L vs. BND
IGLT.L (iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF) and BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGLT.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Actuaries UK Conventional Gilts All Stocks Index, while BND is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGLT.L returned -0.90%/yr vs 2.37%/yr for BND. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IGLT.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BND.
Performance
IGLT.L vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IGLT.L is traded in GBP, while BND is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BND values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGLT.L achieves a -0.84% return, which is significantly lower than BND's 0.81% return. Over the past 10 years, IGLT.L has underperformed BND with an annualized return of -0.90%, while BND has yielded a comparatively higher 2.37% annualized return.
IGLT.L
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- YTD
- -0.84%
- 6M
- -1.14%
- 1Y
- 2.10%
- 3Y*
- 2.44%
- 5Y*
- -4.26%
- 10Y*
- -0.90%
BND
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 1.15%
- YTD
- 0.81%
- 6M
- -0.25%
- 1Y
- 5.61%
- 3Y*
- 1.39%
- 5Y*
- 1.19%
- 10Y*
- 2.37%
IGLT.L vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGLT.L iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF | -0.84% | 4.69% | -3.33% | 3.56% | -23.71% | -5.03% | 8.08% | 6.70% | 0.53% | 1.39% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 0.81% | -0.55% | 3.15% | 0.37% | -2.78% | -0.93% | 4.55% | 4.70% | 5.81% | -5.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGLT.L and BND is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2007 | 0.35 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IGLT.L and BND has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGLT.L vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank
IGLT.L
BND
IGLT.L vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF (IGLT.L) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGLT.L | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.17 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.40 | 1.05 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.07 | 2.76 | -1.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGLT.L | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 | 0.90 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.42 | 0.14 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.10 | 0.24 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.52 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
IGLT.L vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGLT.L drawdown since its inception was -35.52%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -17.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLT.L and BND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGLT.L | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.52% | -17.48% | -18.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.24% | -5.37% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.97% | -8.65% | +1.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.49% | -14.67% | -18.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.52% | -17.48% | -18.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.96% | -9.56% | -16.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.26% | -7.06% | -1.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.97% | 2.04% | -0.07% |
Volatility
IGLT.L vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF (IGLT.L) has a higher volatility of 2.31% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.41%. This indicates that IGLT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGLT.L | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.31% | 1.41% | +0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.73% | 4.84% | -0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.00% | 6.27% | -0.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.02% | 8.64% | +1.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.02% | 10.00% | -0.98% |
IGLT.L vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGLT.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IGLT.L vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
IGLT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, more than BND's 3.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.96% | 3.86% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 2.12% | 2.38% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% |
IGLT.L iShares Core UK Gilts UCITS ETF | 4.50% | 4.26% | 3.69% | 2.40% | 1.32% | 0.79% | 0.95% | 1.25% | 1.31% | 1.30% | 1.88% | 2.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGLT.L and BND have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BND is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BND is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IGLT.L.
IGLT.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while BND is Total Bond Market. IGLT.L tracks FTSE Actuaries UK Conventional Gilts All Stocks Index, while BND tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IGLT.L and 0.03% for BND.
Find the right allocation for IGLT.L and BND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer