IGLD vs. NFTY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IGLD (FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF) and NFTY (First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGLD is a Precious Metals fund actively managed by First Trust, while NFTY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index. IGLD is actively managed, while NFTY is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IGLD returned 13.02%/yr vs 4.62%/yr for NFTY. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IGLD charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for NFTY.

Performance

IGLD vs. NFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGLD achieves a 1.69% return, which is significantly higher than NFTY's -9.70% return.

IGLD

• 1D: -0.81%
• 1M: -1.33%
• YTD: 1.69%
• 6M: 4.44%
• 1Y: 24.53%
• 3Y*: 23.01%
• 5Y*: 13.02%
• 10Y*: —

NFTY

• 1D: -1.34%
• 1M: -1.64%
• YTD: -9.70%
• 6M: -7.99%
• 1Y: -8.48%
• 3Y*: 5.72%
• 5Y*: 4.62%
• 10Y*: 8.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGLD vs. NFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
IGLD FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF	1.69%	47.46%	19.36%	9.24%	-2.34%	4.30%
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF	-9.70%	5.47%	5.18%	24.00%	-3.46%	12.12%

Correlation

The correlation between IGLD and NFTY is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2021	0.19

Return for Risk

IGLD vs. NFTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGLD

IGLD Risk / Return Rank: 28
IGLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
IGLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
IGLD Omega Ratio Rank: 32
IGLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
IGLD Martin Ratio Rank: 27

NFTY

NFTY Risk / Return Rank: 3
NFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
NFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
NFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 4
NFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
NFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGLD vs. NFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IGLD	NFTY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	-0.58	+1.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.47	-0.78	+2.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	0.91	+0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.40	-0.53	+1.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.82	-1.39	+5.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IGLD vs. NFTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is higher than the NFTY Sharpe Ratio of -0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGLD and NFTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IGLD	NFTY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.06	-0.58	+1.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86	0.27	+0.60
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.39	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.94	0.28	+0.66

Drawdowns

IGLD vs. NFTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGLD drawdown since its inception was -18.59%, smaller than the maximum NFTY drawdown of -47.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLD and NFTY.

Drawdown Indicators

	IGLD	NFTY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.59%	-47.67%	+29.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.56%	-16.14%	-1.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.56%	-21.55%	+3.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.59%	-21.55%	+2.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-47.67%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.16%	-17.45%	+2.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.24%	-9.58%	+4.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.43%	6.12%	+0.31%

Volatility

IGLD vs. NFTY - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF (IGLD) has a higher volatility of 5.12% compared to First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) at 4.58%. This indicates that IGLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IGLD	NFTY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.12%	4.58%	+0.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.01%	12.57%	+8.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.24%	14.72%	+8.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.17%	17.39%	-2.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.00%	20.72%	-5.72%

IGLD vs. NFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGLD has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than NFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

IGLD vs. NFTY - Dividend Comparison

IGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.92%, more than NFTY's 1.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IGLD FT Cboe Vest Gold Strategy Target Income ETF	17.92%	9.91%	20.81%	7.85%	4.45%	2.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF	1.96%	1.24%	1.61%	0.13%	5.89%	1.53%	0.61%	0.97%	0.00%	4.10%	3.28%	4.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IGLD and NFTY in my portfolio?

IGLD and NFTY have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IGLD or NFTY?

IGLD has higher volatility (5.12%) compared to NFTY (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGLD dropped -18.59% vs NFTY's -47.67%.

Which ETF is better, IGLD or NFTY?

On 5-year performance, IGLD leads with 13.02% vs 4.62% for NFTY. On fees, NFTY is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, NFTY has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IGLD or NFTY?

Over the 5-year period, IGLD has performed better with a 13.02% return vs 4.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IGLD or NFTY?

NFTY is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for IGLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IGLD or NFTY?

IGLD has the higher dividend yield at 17.92%, compared with 1.96% for NFTY.

What is the main difference between IGLD and NFTY?

IGLD is categorized as Precious Metals, while NFTY is Asia Pacific Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for IGLD and 0.80% for NFTY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IGLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.