PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGLD.DE vs. XDIV.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGLD.DE vs. XDIV.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (IGLD.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IGLD.DE is traded in EUR, while XDIV.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the XDIV.TO values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGLD.DE achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly lower than XDIV.TO's 20.08% return.


IGLD.DE

1D
0.70%
1M
-4.88%
YTD
0.35%
6M
4.58%
1Y
29.44%
3Y*
28.49%
5Y*
10Y*

XDIV.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
3.85%
YTD
20.08%
6M
18.91%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGLD.DE vs. XDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IGLD.DE and XDIV.TO is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025

-0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGLD.DE vs. XDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGLD.DE
IGLD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
IGLD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

XDIV.TO
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGLD.DE vs. XDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (IGLD.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF (XDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGLD.DEXDIV.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.10

IGLD.DE vs. XDIV.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGLD.DEXDIV.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.32

3.84

-2.52

Drawdowns

IGLD.DE vs. XDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGLD.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.62%, which is greater than XDIV.TO's maximum drawdown of -3.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLD.DE and XDIV.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGLD.DEXDIV.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.62%

-3.00%

-14.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.24%

0.00%

-16.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-0.69%

-3.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.03%

Volatility

IGLD.DE vs. XDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGLD.DEXDIV.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.80%

9.31%

+15.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.86%

9.31%

+8.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.86%

9.31%

+8.55%

IGLD.DE vs. XDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGLD.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XDIV.TO's 0.11% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IGLD.DE vs. XDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison

IGLD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XDIV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
IGLD.DE
iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XDIV.TO
iShares Core MSCI Canadian Quality Dividend Index ETF
3.27%3.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGLD.DE and XDIV.TO have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDIV.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDIV.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IGLD.DE.

IGLD.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while XDIV.TO is Dividend. IGLD.DE tracks Gold (EUR Hedged), while XDIV.TO tracks MSCI Canada High Dividend Yield 10% Security Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IGLD.DE and 0.11% for XDIV.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGLD.DE and XDIV.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer