IGLD.DE vs. IWM
IGLD.DE (iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGLD.DE is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold (EUR Hedged), while IWM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IGLD.DE returned 28.49%/yr vs 15.84%/yr for IWM. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IGLD.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWM.
Performance
IGLD.DE vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IGLD.DE is traded in EUR, while IWM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IWM values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGLD.DE achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 20.19% return.
IGLD.DE
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- YTD
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 4.61%
- 1Y
- 28.86%
- 3Y*
- 28.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWM
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 4.03%
- YTD
- 20.19%
- 6M
- 16.87%
- 1Y
- 39.23%
- 3Y*
- 15.84%
- 5Y*
- 7.42%
- 10Y*
- 10.73%
IGLD.DE vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGLD.DE iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC | 0.35% | 63.04% | 24.54% | 10.49% | 2.47% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 20.19% | -0.71% | 18.74% | 13.32% | -4.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGLD.DE and IWM is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2022 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGLD.DE vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank
IGLD.DE
IWM
IGLD.DE vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (IGLD.DE) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGLD.DE | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.35 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 4.49 | -2.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.10 | 14.44 | -10.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGLD.DE | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 2.11 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.32 | 0.39 | +0.93 |
Drawdowns
IGLD.DE vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGLD.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.62%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -53.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLD.DE and IWM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGLD.DE | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.62% | -53.43% | +35.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.62% | -8.77% | -8.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.62% | -30.91% | +13.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.24% | 0.00% | -16.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.72% | -10.71% | +6.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.03% | 2.72% | +4.31% |
Volatility
IGLD.DE vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (IGLD.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.98% compared to iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) at 5.02%. This indicates that IGLD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGLD.DE | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.98% | 5.02% | +0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.79% | 12.82% | +8.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.80% | 18.69% | +6.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 21.89% | -4.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 23.16% | -5.30% |
IGLD.DE vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGLD.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IGLD.DE vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
IGLD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGLD.DE iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 0.87% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGLD.DE and IWM have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IWM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IWM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IGLD.DE.
IGLD.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. IGLD.DE tracks Gold (EUR Hedged), while IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IGLD.DE and 0.19% for IWM.
Find the right allocation for IGLD.DE and IWM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer