PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGLD.DE vs. GLDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGLD.DE vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (IGLD.DE) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IGLD.DE is traded in EUR, while GLDM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GLDM values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGLD.DE achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly lower than GLDM's 4.23% return.


IGLD.DE

1D
0.70%
1M
-2.47%
YTD
0.35%
6M
4.61%
1Y
28.86%
3Y*
28.49%
5Y*
10Y*

GLDM

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.73%
YTD
4.23%
6M
5.86%
1Y
29.46%
3Y*
27.76%
5Y*
19.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGLD.DE vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IGLD.DE
iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC
0.35%63.04%24.54%10.49%2.47%
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
5.05%44.72%35.47%9.65%-0.65%

Correlation

The correlation between IGLD.DE and GLDM is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2022

0.70

The correlation between IGLD.DE and GLDM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGLD.DE vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGLD.DE
IGLD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
IGLD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDM
GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGLD.DE vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (IGLD.DE) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGLD.DEGLDMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.24

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

1.73

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.10

4.14

-0.04

IGLD.DE vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGLD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is comparable to the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGLD.DE and GLDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGLD.DEGLDMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

1.19

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.32

1.10

+0.22

Drawdowns

IGLD.DE vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGLD.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.62%, roughly equal to the maximum GLDM drawdown of -18.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLD.DE and GLDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGLD.DEGLDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.62%

-18.50%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.62%

-17.10%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.62%

-17.10%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.24%

-16.09%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-5.28%

+1.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.03%

7.14%

-0.11%

Volatility

IGLD.DE vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (IGLD.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.98% compared to SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) at 4.61%. This indicates that IGLD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGLD.DEGLDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.98%

4.61%

+1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.79%

21.64%

+0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.80%

24.97%

-0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.86%

16.63%

+1.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.86%

15.64%

+2.22%

IGLD.DE vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGLD.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IGLD.DE vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

Neither IGLD.DE nor GLDM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IGLD.DE and GLDM have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IGLD.DE.

IGLD.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while GLDM is Gold. IGLD.DE tracks Gold (EUR Hedged), while GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IGLD.DE and 0.10% for GLDM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGLD.DE and GLDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer