IGLD.DE vs. ACWD.L
IGLD.DE (iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC) and ACWD.L (SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGLD.DE is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold (EUR Hedged), while ACWD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IGLD.DE returned 28.49%/yr vs 16.93%/yr for ACWD.L. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IGLD.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for ACWD.L.
Performance
IGLD.DE vs. ACWD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IGLD.DE is traded in EUR, while ACWD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ACWD.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGLD.DE achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly lower than ACWD.L's 9.78% return.
IGLD.DE
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -5.31%
- YTD
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 5.07%
- 1Y
- 30.35%
- 3Y*
- 28.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACWD.L
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 9.78%
- 6M
- 9.83%
- 1Y
- 22.82%
- 3Y*
- 16.93%
- 5Y*
- 11.71%
- 10Y*
- 12.12%
IGLD.DE vs. ACWD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGLD.DE iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC | 0.35% | 63.04% | 24.54% | 10.49% | 2.56% |
ACWD.L SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF | 9.78% | 8.26% | 25.53% | 18.60% | -2.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGLD.DE and ACWD.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2022 | 0.09 |
The correlation between IGLD.DE and ACWD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (3 years) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGLD.DE vs. ACWD.L — Risk / Return Rank
IGLD.DE
ACWD.L
IGLD.DE vs. ACWD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (IGLD.DE) and SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGLD.DE | ACWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.33 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 3.59 | -1.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.10 | 13.41 | -9.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGLD.DE | ACWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 1.80 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.32 | 0.72 | +0.61 |
Drawdowns
IGLD.DE vs. ACWD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGLD.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.62%, smaller than the maximum ACWD.L drawdown of -33.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLD.DE and ACWD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGLD.DE | ACWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.62% | -33.03% | +15.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.62% | -6.34% | -11.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.62% | -20.30% | +2.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.24% | -3.22% | -13.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.71% | -4.37% | +0.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.03% | 1.70% | +5.33% |
Volatility
IGLD.DE vs. ACWD.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Gold (EUR Hedged) ETC (IGLD.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.98% compared to SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L) at 3.74%. This indicates that IGLD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGLD.DE | ACWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.98% | 3.74% | +2.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.79% | 9.56% | +12.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.80% | 12.65% | +12.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 14.81% | +3.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 15.72% | +2.14% |
IGLD.DE vs. ACWD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGLD.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWD.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IGLD.DE vs. ACWD.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IGLD.DE nor ACWD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IGLD.DE and ACWD.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACWD.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACWD.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IGLD.DE.
IGLD.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while ACWD.L is Global Equities. IGLD.DE tracks Gold (EUR Hedged), while ACWD.L tracks MSCI ACWI Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IGLD.DE and 0.12% for ACWD.L.
Find the right allocation for IGLD.DE and ACWD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer