IGLA.L vs. AEGG.L
IGLA.L (iShares Global Govt Bond UCITS Acc) and AEGG.L (iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc)) are both Global Bonds funds from iShares - IGLA.L tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD while AEGG.L tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IGLA.L returned 1.46%/yr vs 6.51%/yr for AEGG.L. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IGLA.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for AEGG.L.
Performance
IGLA.L vs. AEGG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IGLA.L is traded in USD, while AEGG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the AEGG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGLA.L achieves a -1.33% return, which is significantly lower than AEGG.L's 0.24% return.
IGLA.L
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- YTD
- -1.33%
- 6M
- -1.11%
- 1Y
- 0.06%
- 3Y*
- 1.46%
- 5Y*
- -3.36%
- 10Y*
- —
AEGG.L
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -0.55%
- YTD
- 0.24%
- 6M
- 1.33%
- 1Y
- 2.20%
- 3Y*
- 6.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGLA.L vs. AEGG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGLA.L iShares Global Govt Bond UCITS Acc | -1.33% | 6.09% | -2.98% | 3.99% | -17.80% | -1.07% |
AEGG.L iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) | 0.24% | 12.24% | 1.35% | 11.22% | -21.88% | 1.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGLA.L and AEGG.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2021 | 0.69 |
The correlation between IGLA.L and AEGG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGLA.L vs. AEGG.L — Risk / Return Rank
IGLA.L
AEGG.L
IGLA.L vs. AEGG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Govt Bond UCITS Acc (IGLA.L) and iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (AEGG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGLA.L | AEGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.05 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.01 | 0.41 | -0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.04 | 0.95 | -0.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGLA.L | AEGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 | 0.28 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | 0.01 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
IGLA.L vs. AEGG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGLA.L drawdown since its inception was -28.01%, smaller than the maximum AEGG.L drawdown of -31.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGLA.L and AEGG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGLA.L | AEGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.01% | -31.90% | +3.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.27% | -5.36% | +1.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.95% | -11.17% | +3.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.18% | -2.81% | -16.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.90% | -12.04% | +0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.69% | 2.32% | -0.63% |
Volatility
IGLA.L vs. AEGG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Govt Bond UCITS Acc (IGLA.L) is 2.06%, while iShares Global Aggregate Bond ESG UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Acc) (AEGG.L) has a volatility of 2.46%. This indicates that IGLA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AEGG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGLA.L | AEGG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.06% | 2.46% | -0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.19% | 5.70% | -1.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.54% | 7.93% | -2.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.22% | 10.94% | -3.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.74% | 10.94% | -4.20% |
IGLA.L vs. AEGG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGLA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than AEGG.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IGLA.L vs. AEGG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IGLA.L nor AEGG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IGLA.L and AEGG.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AEGG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AEGG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IGLA.L.
IGLA.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR USD, while AEGG.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IGLA.L and 0.10% for AEGG.L.
Find the right allocation for IGLA.L and AEGG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer