PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGIFX vs. ANWPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGIFX vs. ANWPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds International Growth and Income Fund Class F-1 (IGIFX) and American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A (ANWPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGIFX achieves a 13.38% return, which is significantly higher than ANWPX's 7.38% return. Over the past 10 years, IGIFX has underperformed ANWPX with an annualized return of 9.59%, while ANWPX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.48% annualized return.


IGIFX

1D
0.60%
1M
4.83%
YTD
13.38%
6M
16.05%
1Y
30.25%
3Y*
19.24%
5Y*
8.60%
10Y*
9.59%

ANWPX

1D
0.11%
1M
5.20%
YTD
7.38%
6M
8.44%
1Y
20.52%
3Y*
18.63%
5Y*
8.96%
10Y*
13.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGIFX vs. ANWPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IGIFX
American Funds International Growth and Income Fund Class F-1
13.38%35.05%3.30%15.22%-15.49%9.79%7.78%27.09%-14.43%26.04%
ANWPX
American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A
7.38%21.33%16.76%24.63%-25.92%17.64%33.42%30.10%-5.99%28.91%

Correlation

The correlation between IGIFX and ANWPX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2008

0.90

The correlation between IGIFX and ANWPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGIFX vs. ANWPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGIFX
IGIFX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
IGIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
IGIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

ANWPX
ANWPX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
ANWPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANWPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANWPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
ANWPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANWPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGIFX vs. ANWPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds International Growth and Income Fund Class F-1 (IGIFX) and American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A (ANWPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGIFXANWPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.28

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

1.80

+0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.31

7.57

+2.74

IGIFX vs. ANWPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGIFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the ANWPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGIFX and ANWPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGIFXANWPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

1.54

+0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.52

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.76

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.67

-0.20

Drawdowns

IGIFX vs. ANWPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGIFX drawdown since its inception was -35.79%, smaller than the maximum ANWPX drawdown of -52.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGIFX and ANWPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGIFXANWPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.79%

-52.34%

+16.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.92%

-11.48%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.60%

-17.93%

+5.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.60%

-34.45%

+3.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.79%

-34.45%

-1.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.93%

-8.11%

+0.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

2.72%

+0.17%

Volatility

IGIFX vs. ANWPX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds International Growth and Income Fund Class F-1 (IGIFX) has a higher volatility of 4.79% compared to American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A (ANWPX) at 3.92%. This indicates that IGIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ANWPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGIFXANWPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.79%

3.92%

+0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.05%

10.79%

+0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.14%

13.39%

-0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.60%

17.21%

-2.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.91%

17.83%

-1.92%

IGIFX vs. ANWPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGIFX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than ANWPX's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGIFX vs. ANWPX - Dividend Comparison

IGIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.23%, more than ANWPX's 6.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANWPX
American Funds New Perspective Fund Class A
6.12%6.57%5.13%5.36%4.16%7.01%4.13%3.67%7.59%5.50%3.86%6.14%
IGIFX
American Funds International Growth and Income Fund Class F-1
7.23%8.10%3.32%2.28%3.96%6.88%1.38%2.38%2.72%1.80%2.19%3.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGIFX and ANWPX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGIFX has higher volatility (4.79%) compared to ANWPX (3.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGIFX dropped -35.79% vs ANWPX's -52.34%.

IGIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGIFX and ANWPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer