PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGHY.L vs. EMXC.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGHY.L vs. EMXC.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (IGHY.L) and Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IGHY.L is traded in GBP, while EMXC.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EMXC.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGHY.L achieves a -2.13% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC.DE's 39.13% return.


IGHY.L

1D
0.16%
1M
1.11%
YTD
-2.13%
6M
-1.93%
1Y
1.29%
3Y*
0.50%
5Y*
-0.88%
10Y*
0.37%

EMXC.DE

1D
-1.68%
1M
8.63%
YTD
39.13%
6M
42.75%
1Y
73.58%
3Y*
25.23%
5Y*
13.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGHY.L vs. EMXC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IGHY.L
iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
-2.13%1.20%-1.38%1.98%-5.02%-3.21%-0.41%-4.76%
EMXC.DE
Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc
39.13%26.16%4.37%12.04%-8.87%9.27%8.05%0.75%

Correlation

The correlation between IGHY.L and EMXC.DE is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2019

0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between IGHY.L and EMXC.DE has dropped to 0.09 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGHY.L vs. EMXC.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGHY.L
IGHY.L Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
IGHY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGHY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGHY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
IGHY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGHY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

EMXC.DE
EMXC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
EMXC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMXC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMXC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
EMXC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMXC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGHY.L vs. EMXC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (IGHY.L) and Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGHY.LEMXC.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.69

-0.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.25

6.10

-5.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.64

22.65

-22.00

IGHY.L vs. EMXC.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGHY.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the EMXC.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGHY.L and EMXC.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGHY.LEMXC.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

3.82

-3.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

0.88

-1.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.19

0.68

-0.87

Drawdowns

IGHY.L vs. EMXC.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGHY.L drawdown since its inception was -38.62%, which is greater than EMXC.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGHY.L and EMXC.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGHY.LEMXC.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.62%

-33.25%

-5.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.16%

-12.00%

+6.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.33%

-19.48%

+13.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.28%

-19.48%

+8.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.35%

-2.33%

-27.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.58%

-5.71%

-21.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

3.24%

-1.24%

Volatility

IGHY.L vs. EMXC.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (IGHY.L) is 1.33%, while Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc (EMXC.DE) has a volatility of 8.29%. This indicates that IGHY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMXC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGHY.LEMXC.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.33%

8.29%

-6.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.95%

16.87%

-11.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.24%

19.17%

-12.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.25%

15.48%

-8.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.12%

17.85%

-8.73%

IGHY.L vs. EMXC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGHY.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EMXC.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGHY.L vs. EMXC.DE - Dividend Comparison

IGHY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, while EMXC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMXC.DE
Lyxor MSCI Emerging Markets Ex China UCITS ETF - Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IGHY.L
iShares Global High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
0.06%0.05%0.05%0.05%0.04%0.04%0.05%0.05%0.05%0.05%0.05%0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGHY.L and EMXC.DE have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMXC.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMXC.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IGHY.L.

IGHY.L is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while EMXC.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. IGHY.L tracks ICE BofA Gbl HY Constnd TR USD, while EMXC.DE tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IGHY.L and 0.15% for EMXC.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGHY.L and EMXC.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer