PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGFFX vs. RERGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGFFX vs. RERGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds International Growth and Income Fund Class F-2 (IGFFX) and American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-6 (RERGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGFFX achieves a 13.53% return, which is significantly higher than RERGX's 12.33% return. Over the past 10 years, IGFFX has outperformed RERGX with an annualized return of 9.89%, while RERGX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.21% annualized return.


IGFFX

1D
0.60%
1M
4.86%
YTD
13.53%
6M
16.22%
1Y
30.61%
3Y*
19.57%
5Y*
8.91%
10Y*
9.89%

RERGX

1D
0.55%
1M
6.76%
YTD
12.33%
6M
15.06%
1Y
29.41%
3Y*
16.36%
5Y*
5.37%
10Y*
9.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGFFX vs. RERGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IGFFX
American Funds International Growth and Income Fund Class F-2
13.53%35.43%3.56%15.57%-15.26%10.11%8.06%27.41%-14.18%26.33%
RERGX
American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-6
12.33%29.34%3.00%16.11%-22.77%2.84%25.27%27.40%-17.33%31.19%

Correlation

The correlation between IGFFX and RERGX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

0.96

The correlation between IGFFX and RERGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGFFX vs. RERGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGFFX
IGFFX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
IGFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
IGFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

RERGX
RERGX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
RERGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RERGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
RERGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
RERGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
RERGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGFFX vs. RERGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds International Growth and Income Fund Class F-2 (IGFFX) and American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-6 (RERGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGFFXRERGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.35

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

2.32

+0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.47

8.74

+1.73

IGFFX vs. RERGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGFFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the RERGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGFFX and RERGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGFFXRERGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

1.89

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.32

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.55

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.43

+0.06

Drawdowns

IGFFX vs. RERGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGFFX drawdown since its inception was -35.76%, roughly equal to the maximum RERGX drawdown of -37.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGFFX and RERGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGFFXRERGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.76%

-37.30%

+1.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.89%

-12.52%

+1.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.59%

-15.62%

+3.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.34%

-37.30%

+6.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.76%

-37.30%

+1.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.76%

-9.21%

+1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

3.31%

-0.43%

Volatility

IGFFX vs. RERGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds International Growth and Income Fund Class F-2 (IGFFX) is 4.78%, while American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-6 (RERGX) has a volatility of 5.40%. This indicates that IGFFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RERGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGFFXRERGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.78%

5.40%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.04%

12.91%

-1.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.14%

15.38%

-2.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.61%

16.67%

-2.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.92%

16.93%

-1.01%

IGFFX vs. RERGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGFFX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than RERGX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGFFX vs. RERGX - Dividend Comparison

IGFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.49%, less than RERGX's 12.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGFFX
American Funds International Growth and Income Fund Class F-2
7.49%8.38%3.65%2.55%4.28%7.18%1.60%2.62%3.06%2.04%2.59%3.48%
RERGX
American Funds EuroPacific Growth Fund Class R-6
12.42%13.95%4.96%3.95%2.02%10.19%0.41%3.14%3.17%4.99%1.64%3.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, IGFFX and RERGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RERGX has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to IGFFX (4.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGFFX dropped -35.76% vs RERGX's -37.30%.

IGFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGFFX and RERGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer