PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGFFX vs. PRGSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGFFX vs. PRGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds International Growth and Income Fund Class F-2 (IGFFX) and T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGFFX achieves a 13.53% return, which is significantly lower than PRGSX's 23.78% return. Over the past 10 years, IGFFX has underperformed PRGSX with an annualized return of 9.89%, while PRGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.95% annualized return.


IGFFX

1D
0.60%
1M
4.86%
YTD
13.53%
6M
16.22%
1Y
30.61%
3Y*
19.57%
5Y*
8.91%
10Y*
9.89%

PRGSX

1D
1.03%
1M
10.17%
YTD
23.78%
6M
24.65%
1Y
44.27%
3Y*
24.53%
5Y*
10.12%
10Y*
16.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGFFX vs. PRGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IGFFX
American Funds International Growth and Income Fund Class F-2
13.53%35.43%3.56%15.57%-15.26%10.11%8.06%27.41%-14.18%26.33%
PRGSX
T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund
23.78%21.42%16.80%25.70%-28.01%9.81%52.29%35.84%-4.51%32.64%

Correlation

The correlation between IGFFX and PRGSX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2008

0.84

The correlation between IGFFX and PRGSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGFFX vs. PRGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGFFX
IGFFX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
IGFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
IGFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

PRGSX
PRGSX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PRGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
PRGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGFFX vs. PRGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds International Growth and Income Fund Class F-2 (IGFFX) and T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGFFXPRGSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.44

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

3.48

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.47

14.22

-3.75

IGFFX vs. PRGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGFFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the PRGSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGFFX and PRGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGFFXPRGSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

2.48

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.52

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.86

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.53

-0.04

Drawdowns

IGFFX vs. PRGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGFFX drawdown since its inception was -35.76%, smaller than the maximum PRGSX drawdown of -64.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGFFX and PRGSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGFFXPRGSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.76%

-64.06%

+28.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.89%

-12.77%

+1.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.59%

-21.13%

+8.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.34%

-38.11%

+7.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.76%

-38.11%

+2.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.76%

-13.48%

+5.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

3.11%

-0.23%

Volatility

IGFFX vs. PRGSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds International Growth and Income Fund Class F-2 (IGFFX) is 4.78%, while T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund (PRGSX) has a volatility of 5.50%. This indicates that IGFFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGFFXPRGSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.78%

5.50%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.04%

14.84%

-3.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.14%

17.93%

-4.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.61%

19.66%

-5.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.92%

19.77%

-3.85%

IGFFX vs. PRGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGFFX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than PRGSX's 0.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGFFX vs. PRGSX - Dividend Comparison

IGFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.49%, less than PRGSX's 7.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGFFX
American Funds International Growth and Income Fund Class F-2
7.49%8.38%3.65%2.55%4.28%7.18%1.60%2.62%3.06%2.04%2.59%3.48%
PRGSX
T. Rowe Price Global Stock Fund
7.76%9.60%6.73%0.27%0.00%13.67%5.67%2.21%5.81%0.03%0.63%0.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGFFX and PRGSX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRGSX has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to IGFFX (4.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGFFX dropped -35.76% vs PRGSX's -64.06%.

PRGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGFFX and PRGSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer