IGEB vs. BINC
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Investment Grade Bond Factor ETF (IGEB) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC).
IGEB and BINC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IGEB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the BlackRock Investment Grade Enhanced Bond Index. It was launched on Jul 11, 2017. BINC is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on May 19, 2023.
Performance
IGEB vs. BINC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IGEB vs. BINC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IGEB iShares Investment Grade Bond Factor ETF | -0.52% | 8.17% | 3.10% | 6.61% |
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | -0.78% | 7.57% | 5.76% | 7.08% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGEB achieves a -0.52% return, which is significantly higher than BINC's -0.78% return.
IGEB
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -1.90%
- YTD
- -0.52%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- 1Y
- 5.18%
- 3Y*
- 5.36%
- 5Y*
- 1.21%
- 10Y*
- —
BINC
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -2.11%
- YTD
- -0.78%
- 6M
- 0.65%
- 1Y
- 5.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IGEB vs. BINC - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGEB has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than BINC's 0.40% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IGEB vs. BINC — Risk / Return Rank
IGEB
BINC
IGEB vs. BINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Investment Grade Bond Factor ETF (IGEB) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IGEB | BINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.02 | 1.74 | -0.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.42 | 2.29 | -0.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.38 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.74 | 1.91 | -0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.88 | 7.93 | -2.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IGEB | BINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 1.74 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 2.28 | -1.81 |
Correlation
The correlation between IGEB and BINC is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IGEB vs. BINC - Dividend Comparison
IGEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, less than BINC's 5.91% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGEB iShares Investment Grade Bond Factor ETF | 4.58% | 4.92% | 5.09% | 4.60% | 3.64% | 3.84% | 3.78% | 5.61% | 3.59% | 1.62% |
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | 5.46% | 5.86% | 6.14% | 3.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IGEB vs. BINC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGEB drawdown since its inception was -21.13%, which is greater than BINC's maximum drawdown of -2.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGEB and BINC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGEB | BINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.13% | -2.69% | -18.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.06% | -2.69% | -0.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.95% | -2.14% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.97% | -0.33% | -4.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.91% | 0.65% | +0.26% |
Volatility
IGEB vs. BINC - Volatility Comparison
iShares Investment Grade Bond Factor ETF (IGEB) has a higher volatility of 2.13% compared to iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) at 1.25%. This indicates that IGEB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IGEB | BINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.13% | 1.25% | +0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.89% | 1.69% | +1.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.09% | 2.94% | +2.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.71% | 3.03% | +3.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.56% | 3.03% | +3.53% |