PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGEA.L vs. HYGB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGEA.L vs. HYGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IGEA.L) and VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HYGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IGEA.L is traded in USD, while HYGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HYGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGEA.L achieves a -5.77% return, which is significantly lower than HYGB.L's 3.78% return.


IGEA.L

1D
0.26%
1M
0.09%
6M
-3.15%
YTD
-5.77%
1Y
-6.44%
3Y*
1.08%
5Y*
-0.40%
10Y*
1.10%
ALL TIME*
1.07%

HYGB.L

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.08%
6M
3.19%
YTD
3.78%
1Y
8.30%
3Y*
10.05%
5Y*
2.90%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-0.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGEA.L vs. HYGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IGEA.L
iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
-5.77%5.84%1.57%4.77%-7.79%-4.40%9.11%8.96%-1.65%
HYGB.L
VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
3.78%9.22%11.83%7.02%-12.94%-0.32%5.02%15.45%-30.18%

Correlation

The correlation between IGEA.L and HYGB.L is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2018

0.15

The correlation between IGEA.L and HYGB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGEA.L vs. HYGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGEA.L
IGEA.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
IGEA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGEA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGEA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
IGEA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGEA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

HYGB.L
HYGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
HYGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
HYGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGEA.L vs. HYGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IGEA.L) and VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HYGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IGEA.LHYGB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

1.30

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.75

2.84

-3.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.40

12.45

-13.84

IGEA.L vs. HYGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGEA.L Sharpe Ratio is -1.06, which is lower than the HYGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGEA.L and HYGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IGEA.L vs. HYGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGEA.L drawdown since its inception was -21.51%, smaller than the maximum HYGB.L drawdown of -37.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGEA.L and HYGB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGEA.LHYGB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.51%

-37.51%

+16.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.59%

-2.91%

-5.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.59%

-4.72%

-3.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.81%

-25.04%

+6.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.56%

-3.30%

-4.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.95%

-21.18%

+15.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.61%

0.67%

+3.94%

Volatility

IGEA.L vs. HYGB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IGEA.L) is 1.02%, while VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HYGB.L) has a volatility of 1.26%. This indicates that IGEA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGEA.LHYGB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.02%

1.26%

-0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.82%

4.67%

+0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.06%

5.34%

+0.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.40%

17.85%

-11.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.32%

17.17%

-10.85%

IGEA.L vs. HYGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGEA.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than HYGB.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

IGEA.L vs. HYGB.L - Dividend Comparison

IGEA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, while HYGB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYGB.L
VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IGEA.L
iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.77%3.24%3.07%2.87%2.96%2.42%2.80%2.46%2.57%2.02%3.01%1.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGEA.L and HYGB.L have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HYGB.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HYGB.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IGEA.L.

IGEA.L tracks BBG EM Asia Local Currency Govt Country Cap NET Index, while HYGB.L tracks ICE BofAML Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IGEA.L and 0.40% for HYGB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGEA.L and HYGB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer