PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYGB.L vs. WING.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYGB.L vs. WING.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HYGB.L) and iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WING.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HYGB.L is traded in GBP, while WING.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the WING.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYGB.L achieves a 3.73% return, which is significantly higher than WING.L's 1.09% return.


HYGB.L

1D
0.36%
1M
-0.41%
6M
2.50%
YTD
3.73%
1Y
7.76%
3Y*
8.68%
5Y*
3.29%
10Y*

WING.L

1D
0.54%
1M
-1.55%
6M
0.37%
YTD
1.09%
1Y
5.51%
3Y*
6.18%
5Y*
2.87%
10Y*
5.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYGB.L vs. WING.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HYGB.L
VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
3.73%1.56%13.72%1.66%-2.52%0.59%1.90%10.99%-23.28%
WING.L
iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.09%4.60%4.69%7.28%-4.18%3.22%14.50%11.15%4.32%

Correlation

The correlation between HYGB.L and WING.L is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2018

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYGB.L vs. WING.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYGB.L
HYGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
HYGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
HYGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

WING.L
WING.L Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
WING.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WING.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
WING.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
WING.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
WING.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYGB.L vs. WING.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HYGB.L) and iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WING.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYGB.LWING.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.15

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.33

1.78

+0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.93

4.97

+0.96

HYGB.L vs. WING.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYGB.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is higher than the WING.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYGB.L and WING.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYGB.L vs. WING.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYGB.L drawdown since its inception was -26.72%, which is greater than WING.L's maximum drawdown of -16.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYGB.L and WING.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYGB.LWING.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.72%

-16.98%

-9.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.31%

-3.09%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.96%

-7.00%

-1.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.02%

-10.87%

-12.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.93%

-2.00%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.28%

-2.59%

-11.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

1.10%

+0.20%

Volatility

HYGB.L vs. WING.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HYGB.L) is 1.48%, while iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WING.L) has a volatility of 2.18%. This indicates that HYGB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WING.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYGB.LWING.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.48%

2.18%

-0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.96%

5.11%

-0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.52%

6.29%

+0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.18%

8.06%

+10.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.40%

10.16%

+7.24%

HYGB.L vs. WING.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYGB.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than WING.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYGB.L vs. WING.L - Dividend Comparison

HYGB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WING.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HYGB.L
VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WING.L
iShares Fallen Angels High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
5.71%5.67%5.86%5.20%4.43%3.92%4.25%4.56%4.98%4.44%2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYGB.L and WING.L have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HYGB.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HYGB.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for WING.L.

HYGB.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while WING.L is High Yield Bonds. HYGB.L tracks ICE BofAML Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index, while WING.L tracks Bloomberg Global Corporate ex EM Fallen Angels 3% Issuer Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for HYGB.L and 0.50% for WING.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYGB.L and WING.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer