IGDA.L vs. EQGB.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IGDA.L (Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc) and EQGB.L (Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - IGDA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Islamic Market Developed Markets Index, while EQGB.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IGDA.L returned 21.23%/yr vs 30.52%/yr for EQGB.L. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IGDA.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for EQGB.L.

Performance

IGDA.L vs. EQGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc (IGDA.L) and Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc (EQGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

IGDA.L is traded in USD, while EQGB.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the EQGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGDA.L achieves a 15.04% return, which is significantly lower than EQGB.L's 18.57% return.

IGDA.L

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: 6.32%
• YTD: 15.04%
• 6M: 15.93%
• 1Y: 34.82%
• 3Y*: 21.23%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EQGB.L

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: 7.50%
• YTD: 18.57%
• 6M: 19.28%
• 1Y: 37.80%
• 3Y*: 30.52%
• 5Y*: 15.13%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGDA.L vs. EQGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
IGDA.L Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc	15.04%	18.74%	17.94%	29.72%	-14.30%
EQGB.L Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc	18.57%	28.61%	24.02%	62.04%	-32.44%

Correlation

The correlation between IGDA.L and EQGB.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022	0.83

The correlation between IGDA.L and EQGB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

IGDA.L vs. EQGB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IGDA.L	EQGB.L
Technology	41.4%	53.6%
Healthcare	11.3%	4.2%
Consumer Cyclical	10.8%	12.2%
Industrials	10.8%	3.1%
Communication Services	9.4%	15.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	7.7%
Basic Materials	4.7%	1.1%
Energy	3.6%	0.6%
Financial Services	2.1%	0.2%
Real Estate	1.0%	0.1%
Utilities	0.3%	1.4%

Return for Risk

IGDA.L vs. EQGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGDA.L

IGDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 76
IGDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
IGDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
IGDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 74
IGDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
IGDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 79

EQGB.L

EQGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 73
EQGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
EQGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
EQGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 72
EQGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
EQGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGDA.L vs. EQGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc (IGDA.L) and Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc (EQGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IGDA.L	EQGB.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	2.05	+0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.51	2.92	+0.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.34	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.57	2.52	+1.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.24	9.34	+5.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IGDA.L vs. EQGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGDA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the EQGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGDA.L and EQGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IGDA.L	EQGB.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.47	2.05	+0.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.61	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.85	0.79	+0.05

Drawdowns

IGDA.L vs. EQGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGDA.L drawdown since its inception was -24.18%, smaller than the maximum EQGB.L drawdown of -47.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGDA.L and EQGB.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	IGDA.L	EQGB.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.18%	-47.56%	+23.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.71%	-14.96%	+5.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.12%	-22.21%	+2.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-47.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.17%	-1.12%	-0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.19%	-9.54%	+4.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.28%	4.03%	-1.75%

Volatility

IGDA.L vs. EQGB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc (IGDA.L) is 4.65%, while Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc (EQGB.L) has a volatility of 5.53%. This indicates that IGDA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IGDA.L	EQGB.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.65%	5.53%	-0.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.78%	13.97%	-3.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.04%	18.40%	-4.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.64%	24.75%	-6.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.64%	24.79%	-6.15%

IGDA.L vs. EQGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGDA.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than EQGB.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

IGDA.L vs. EQGB.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IGDA.L nor EQGB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
EQGB.L Invesco EQQQ Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF GBP Hdg Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.04%
IGDA.L Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IGDA.L and EQGB.L in my portfolio?

IGDA.L and EQGB.L have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IGDA.L or EQGB.L?

On fees, EQGB.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IGDA.L or EQGB.L?

EQGB.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IGDA.L.

What is the main difference between IGDA.L and EQGB.L?

IGDA.L is categorized as Global Equities, while EQGB.L is Nasdaq-100. IGDA.L tracks Dow Jones Islamic Market Developed Markets Index, while EQGB.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IGDA.L and 0.35% for EQGB.L.