PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGCB.L vs. XBLC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGCB.L vs. XBLC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Dist (IGCB.L) and Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XBLC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IGCB.L is traded in GBp, while XBLC.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XBLC.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGCB.L achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly lower than XBLC.L's -0.18% return.


IGCB.L

1D
0.24%
1M
1.78%
YTD
-0.24%
6M
0.09%
1Y
4.63%
3Y*
6.06%
5Y*
-0.66%
10Y*

XBLC.L

1D
0.23%
1M
0.94%
YTD
-0.18%
6M
-0.53%
1Y
4.62%
3Y*
4.71%
5Y*
0.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGCB.L vs. XBLC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IGCB.L
Invesco GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Dist
-0.24%6.83%1.93%9.20%-18.57%-4.00%8.69%
XBLC.L
Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C
-0.18%8.46%-0.39%5.36%-8.81%-6.92%5.91%

Correlation

The correlation between IGCB.L and XBLC.L is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2020

0.40

The correlation between IGCB.L and XBLC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGCB.L vs. XBLC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGCB.L
IGCB.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
IGCB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGCB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGCB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
IGCB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGCB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

XBLC.L
XBLC.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XBLC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBLC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBLC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
XBLC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBLC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGCB.L vs. XBLC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Dist (IGCB.L) and Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XBLC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGCB.LXBLC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.17

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

1.23

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.35

3.14

+0.20

IGCB.L vs. XBLC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGCB.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is comparable to the XBLC.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGCB.L and XBLC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGCB.LXBLC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

0.96

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

0.04

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.10

-0.08

Drawdowns

IGCB.L vs. XBLC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGCB.L drawdown since its inception was -30.44%, which is greater than XBLC.L's maximum drawdown of -21.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGCB.L and XBLC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGCB.LXBLC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.44%

-21.28%

-9.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.00%

-3.75%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.00%

-3.75%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.39%

-16.74%

-12.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.54%

-5.88%

-1.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.31%

-8.83%

-2.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.38%

1.47%

-0.09%

Volatility

IGCB.L vs. XBLC.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Dist (IGCB.L) has a higher volatility of 2.17% compared to Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XBLC.L) at 1.57%. This indicates that IGCB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XBLC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGCB.LXBLC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.17%

1.57%

+0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.95%

3.68%

+1.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.93%

4.82%

+1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.65%

6.24%

+1.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.73%

6.90%

+0.83%

IGCB.L vs. XBLC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGCB.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XBLC.L's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IGCB.L vs. XBLC.L - Dividend Comparison

IGCB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.27%, while XBLC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
IGCB.L
Invesco GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Dist
5.27%5.18%5.18%4.26%2.54%1.74%1.22%
XBLC.L
Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGCB.L and XBLC.L have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IGCB.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IGCB.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for XBLC.L.

IGCB.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts TR, while XBLC.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IGCB.L and 0.12% for XBLC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGCB.L and XBLC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer