IGBH vs. IWM
IGBH (iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGBH is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the BlackRock Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond Index, while IWM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGBH returned 5.03%/yr vs 12.10%/yr for IWM. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IGBH charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWM.
Performance
IGBH vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IGBH achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 21.93% return. Over the past 10 years, IGBH has underperformed IWM with an annualized return of 5.03%, while IWM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.10% annualized return.
IGBH
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- 2.13%
- 6M
- 2.01%
- 1Y
- 9.10%
- 3Y*
- 8.54%
- 5Y*
- 5.24%
- 10Y*
- 5.03%
IWM
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- 3.14%
- YTD
- 21.93%
- 6M
- 18.77%
- 1Y
- 42.48%
- 3Y*
- 19.66%
- 5Y*
- 6.49%
- 10Y*
- 12.10%
IGBH vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGBH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 2.13% | 7.90% | 7.80% | 12.12% | -2.82% | 2.20% | 1.09% | 9.62% | -4.54% | 9.36% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 21.93% | 12.66% | 11.38% | 16.83% | -20.48% | 14.54% | 20.03% | 25.39% | -11.12% | 14.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between IGBH and IWM is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2015 | 0.37 |
Over the past year, IGBH and IWM have become more correlated (0.58) than their long-term average of 0.37, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IGBH vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank
IGBH
IWM
IGBH vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGBH) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IGBH | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.36 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 3.87 | -1.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.91 | 13.69 | -5.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IGBH vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IGBH drawdown since its inception was -33.67%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGBH and IWM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IGBH | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.67% | -59.05% | +25.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.24% | -11.03% | +6.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.93% | -27.50% | +20.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.48% | -31.91% | +21.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.67% | -41.13% | +7.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | 0.00% | -0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.65% | -10.74% | +8.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.15% | 3.11% | -1.96% |
Volatility
IGBH vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGBH) is 0.71%, while iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has a volatility of 6.31%. This indicates that IGBH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IGBH | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.71% | 6.31% | -5.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.15% | 14.28% | -11.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.03% | 19.69% | -15.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.05% | 22.60% | -16.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.20% | 23.06% | -13.86% |
IGBH vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IGBH has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IGBH vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
IGBH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.67%, more than IWM's 0.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGBH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 5.67% | 6.23% | 6.88% | 7.32% | 3.84% | 2.71% | 2.39% | 3.40% | 5.56% | 2.87% | 2.62% | 1.12% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 0.89% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IGBH and IWM have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWM has higher volatility (6.31%) compared to IGBH (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGBH dropped -33.67% vs IWM's -59.05%.
On 10-year performance, IWM leads with 12.10% vs 5.03% for IGBH. On fees, IGBH is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, IGBH has been the lower-risk option at 0.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IWM has performed better with a 12.10% return vs 5.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGBH is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for IWM.
IGBH has the higher dividend yield at 5.67%, compared with 0.89% for IWM.
IGBH is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. IGBH tracks BlackRock Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond Index, while IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for IGBH and 0.19% for IWM.
IGBH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IGBH and IWM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer