PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGBH vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGBH vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGBH) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGBH achieves a 2.44% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -27.45% return.


IGBH

1D
0.12%
1M
1.52%
YTD
2.44%
6M
3.11%
1Y
9.11%
3Y*
9.02%
5Y*
5.30%
10Y*
5.04%

IBIT

1D
-2.65%
1M
-22.17%
YTD
-27.45%
6M
-31.40%
1Y
-39.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGBH vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IGBH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
2.44%7.90%6.39%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-27.45%-6.41%99.21%

Correlation

The correlation between IGBH and IBIT is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGBH vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGBH
IGBH Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
IGBH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGBH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGBH Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
IGBH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGBH Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGBH vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGBH) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGBHIBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

0.86

+0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

-0.80

+2.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.90

-1.39

+9.29

IGBH vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGBH Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGBH and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGBHIBITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

-0.91

+3.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.27

+0.25

Drawdowns

IGBH vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGBH drawdown since its inception was -33.67%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -49.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGBH and IBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGBHIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.67%

-49.47%

+15.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.24%

-49.47%

+45.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-49.47%

+49.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.66%

-16.07%

+13.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

28.61%

-27.46%

Volatility

IGBH vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGBH) is 0.82%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 9.14%. This indicates that IGBH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGBHIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.82%

9.14%

-8.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.14%

33.89%

-30.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.05%

43.76%

-39.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.13%

50.18%

-44.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.20%

50.18%

-40.98%

IGBH vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGBH has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IGBH vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

IGBH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.66%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IGBH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
5.66%6.23%6.88%7.32%3.84%2.71%2.39%3.40%5.56%2.87%2.62%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGBH and IBIT have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBIT has higher volatility (9.14%) compared to IGBH (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGBH dropped -33.67% vs IBIT's -49.47%.

On 1-year performance, IGBH leads with 9.11% vs -39.60% for IBIT. On fees, IGBH is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, IGBH has been the lower-risk option at 0.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IGBH has performed better with a 9.11% return vs -39.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IGBH is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.

IGBH has the higher dividend yield at 5.66%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

IGBH is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. IGBH tracks BlackRock Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for IGBH and 0.25% for IBIT.

IGBH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGBH and IBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer