PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IGBH vs. FLDR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IGBH vs. FLDR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGBH) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGBH achieves a 2.44% return, which is significantly higher than FLDR's 1.44% return.


IGBH

1D
0.12%
1M
1.52%
YTD
2.44%
6M
3.11%
1Y
9.11%
3Y*
9.02%
5Y*
5.30%
10Y*
5.04%

FLDR

1D
0.00%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.44%
6M
1.76%
1Y
4.70%
3Y*
5.35%
5Y*
3.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGBH vs. FLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IGBH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
2.44%7.90%7.80%12.12%-2.82%2.20%1.09%9.62%-4.17%
FLDR
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF
1.44%5.41%5.71%6.32%-0.33%-0.18%2.01%4.52%0.94%

Correlation

The correlation between IGBH and FLDR is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2018

-0.00

The correlation between IGBH and FLDR shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (all time) to 0.14 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IGBH vs. FLDR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGBH
IGBH Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
IGBH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGBH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGBH Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
IGBH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGBH Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

FLDR
FLDR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
FLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGBH vs. FLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGBH) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IGBHFLDRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

2.73

-1.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

10.10

-7.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.90

69.31

-61.40

IGBH vs. FLDR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGBH Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is lower than the FLDR Sharpe Ratio of 5.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGBH and FLDR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IGBHFLDRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

5.88

-3.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

3.07

-2.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.61

-0.10

Drawdowns

IGBH vs. FLDR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGBH drawdown since its inception was -33.67%, which is greater than FLDR's maximum drawdown of -12.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGBH and FLDR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IGBHFLDRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.67%

-12.23%

-21.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.24%

-0.47%

-3.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.93%

-0.76%

-6.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.48%

-2.33%

-8.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

-0.02%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.66%

-0.35%

-2.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

0.07%

+1.08%

Volatility

IGBH vs. FLDR - Volatility Comparison

iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGBH) has a higher volatility of 0.82% compared to Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) at 0.19%. This indicates that IGBH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IGBHFLDRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.82%

0.19%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.14%

0.58%

+2.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.05%

0.80%

+3.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.13%

1.21%

+4.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.20%

5.26%

+3.94%

IGBH vs. FLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison

IGBH has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than FLDR's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IGBH vs. FLDR - Dividend Comparison

IGBH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.66%, more than FLDR's 4.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLDR
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF
4.43%4.66%5.50%5.28%2.09%0.51%1.22%2.69%1.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IGBH
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
5.66%6.23%6.88%7.32%3.84%2.71%2.39%3.40%5.56%2.87%2.62%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


IGBH and FLDR have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGBH has higher volatility (0.82%) compared to FLDR (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IGBH dropped -33.67% vs FLDR's -12.23%.

On 5-year performance, IGBH leads with 5.30% vs 3.70% for FLDR. On fees, FLDR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FLDR has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IGBH has performed better with a 5.30% return vs 3.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLDR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for IGBH.

IGBH has the higher dividend yield at 5.66%, compared with 4.43% for FLDR.

IGBH tracks BlackRock Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond Index, while FLDR tracks Fidelity Low Duration Investment Grade Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for IGBH and 0.15% for FLDR.

FLDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.88 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGBH and FLDR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer