PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IGB.AX vs. IAF.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IGB.AX vs. IAF.AX

Last updated Jul 18, 2026
Documentation

IGB.AX (iShares Treasury ETF) and IAF.AX (iShares Core Composite Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IGB.AX is a Government Bonds fund tracking the iShares Treasury Index, while IAF.AX is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the iShares Core Composite Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IGB.AX returned 0.94%/yr vs 1.51%/yr for IAF.AX. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

IGB.AX vs. IAF.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in iShares Treasury ETF (IGB.AX) and iShares Core Composite Bond ETF (IAF.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IGB.AX achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly lower than IAF.AX's 1.94% return. Over the past 10 years, IGB.AX has underperformed IAF.AX with an annualized return of 0.94%, while IAF.AX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.51% annualized return.

IGB.AX

1D
-0.21%
1M
-0.34%
6M
0.91%
YTD
1.29%
1Y
0.77%
3Y*
2.77%
5Y*
-0.75%
10Y*
0.94%

IAF.AX

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.11%
6M
1.18%
YTD
1.94%
1Y
1.47%
3Y*
3.56%
5Y*
-0.08%
10Y*
1.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IGB.AX vs. IAF.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IGB.AX
iShares Treasury ETF		1.29%2.62%1.90%3.88%-10.24%-3.27%3.68%7.38%4.73%2.37%
IAF.AX
iShares Core Composite Bond ETF		1.94%2.97%2.70%4.96%-9.82%-3.09%3.92%7.29%4.19%3.38%

Correlation

The correlation between IGB.AX and IAF.AX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2012

0.72

The correlation between IGB.AX and IAF.AX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.93 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Treasury ETF

iShares Core Composite Bond ETF

Often compared with IGB.AX:
IGB.AX vs. AGVT.AXIGB.AX vs. GOVT.AXIGB.AX vs. RGB.AXIGB.AX vs. RSM.AXIGB.AX vs. VGB.AXIGB.AX vs. AUMF.AXIGB.AX vs. BILL.AX
Often compared with IAF.AX:
IAF.AX vs. BNDS.AXIAF.AX vs. BOND.AXIAF.AX vs. IHEB.AXIAF.AX vs. IHHY.AXIAF.AX vs. QPON.AXIAF.AX vs. VAF.AXIAF.AX vs. VEFI.AX

Return for Risk

IGB.AX vs. IAF.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IGB.AX
IGB.AX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
IGB.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGB.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGB.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
IGB.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGB.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
IAF.AX
IAF.AX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
IAF.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAF.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAF.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
IAF.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAF.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IGB.AX vs. IAF.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Treasury ETF (IGB.AX) and iShares Core Composite Bond ETF (IAF.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

IGB.AXIAF.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.19
0.39

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.30
0.59

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.07

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.19

0.40

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.37

0.84

-0.47

IGB.AX vs. IAF.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IGB.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is lower than the IAF.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IGB.AX and IAF.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IGB.AX vs. IAF.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IGB.AX drawdown since its inception was -16.94%, which is greater than IAF.AX's maximum drawdown of -15.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IGB.AX and IAF.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IGB.AXIAF.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.94%

-15.62%

-1.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.87%

-3.57%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.92%

-3.65%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.01%

-15.10%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.94%

-15.62%

-1.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.91%

-2.00%

-3.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.45%

-3.25%

-1.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

1.72%

+0.33%

Volatility

IGB.AX vs. IAF.AX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Treasury ETF (IGB.AX) has a higher volatility of 0.87% compared to iShares Core Composite Bond ETF (IAF.AX) at 0.68%. This indicates that IGB.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAF.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IGB.AXIAF.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.87%

0.68%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.89%

2.70%

+0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.01%

3.65%

+0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.40%

5.00%

+0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.02%

4.33%

+0.69%

Dividends

IGB.AX vs. IAF.AX - Dividend Comparison

IGB.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than IAF.AX's 3.15% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IAF.AX
iShares Core Composite Bond ETF		3.15%2.99%2.78%1.51%1.57%1.63%1.59%2.21%2.28%2.30%2.47%3.62%
IGB.AX
iShares Treasury ETF		2.60%3.10%2.47%1.63%0.80%1.20%2.47%1.54%1.56%2.11%2.09%5.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

IGB.AX and IAF.AX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IGB.AX is categorized as Government Bonds, while IAF.AX is Total Bond Market. IGB.AX tracks iShares Treasury Index, while IAF.AX tracks iShares Core Composite Bond Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IGB.AX and IAF.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer