IAF.AX vs. BNDS.AX
IAF.AX (iShares Core Composite Bond ETF) and BNDS.AX (BetaShares Western Asset Australian Bond Active ETF) are both Total Bond Market funds. IAF.AX is passively managed, while BNDS.AX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, IAF.AX returned -0.06%/yr vs -0.31%/yr for BNDS.AX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure.
Performance
IAF.AX vs. BNDS.AX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAF.AX achieves a 2.02% return, which is significantly higher than BNDS.AX's 1.05% return.
IAF.AX
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- 6M
- 1.37%
- YTD
- 2.02%
- 1Y
- 1.75%
- 3Y*
- 3.60%
- 5Y*
- -0.06%
- 10Y*
- 1.53%
BNDS.AX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- 6M
- 0.79%
- YTD
- 1.05%
- 1Y
- 0.62%
- 3Y*
- 3.36%
- 5Y*
- -0.31%
- 10Y*
- —
IAF.AX vs. BNDS.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAF.AX iShares Core Composite Bond ETF | 2.02% | 2.97% | 2.70% | 4.96% | -9.82% | -3.09% | 3.92% | 7.29% | 1.84% |
BNDS.AX BetaShares Western Asset Australian Bond Active ETF | 1.05% | 2.52% | 3.08% | 5.73% | -10.96% | -2.83% | 4.81% | 7.50% | 2.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between IAF.AX and BNDS.AX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2018 | 0.83 |
The correlation between IAF.AX and BNDS.AX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IAF.AX vs. BNDS.AX — Risk / Return Rank
IAF.AX
BNDS.AX
IAF.AX vs. BNDS.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Composite Bond ETF (IAF.AX) and BetaShares Western Asset Australian Bond Active ETF (BNDS.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IAF.AX | BNDS.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.03 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.51 | 0.14 | +0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.09 | 0.27 | +0.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IAF.AX vs. BNDS.AX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAF.AX drawdown since its inception was -15.62%, roughly equal to the maximum BNDS.AX drawdown of -16.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAF.AX and BNDS.AX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAF.AX | BNDS.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.62% | -16.27% | +0.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.57% | -5.05% | +1.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.65% | -5.05% | +1.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.10% | -16.11% | +1.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.92% | -2.92% | +1.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.25% | -5.37% | +2.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.72% | 2.59% | -0.87% |
Volatility
IAF.AX vs. BNDS.AX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core Composite Bond ETF (IAF.AX) is 0.68%, while BetaShares Western Asset Australian Bond Active ETF (BNDS.AX) has a volatility of 0.78%. This indicates that IAF.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNDS.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IAF.AX | BNDS.AX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.68% | 0.78% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.70% | 3.05% | -0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.65% | 3.73% | -0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.00% | 5.36% | -0.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.33% | 5.23% | -0.90% |
Dividends
IAF.AX vs. BNDS.AX - Dividend Comparison
IAF.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, more than BNDS.AX's 2.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDS.AX BetaShares Western Asset Australian Bond Active ETF | 2.98% | 3.39% | 3.31% | 2.63% | 1.47% | 1.25% | 2.46% | 2.31% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IAF.AX iShares Core Composite Bond ETF | 3.15% | 2.99% | 2.78% | 1.51% | 1.57% | 1.63% | 1.59% | 2.21% | 2.28% | 2.30% | 2.47% | 3.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IAF.AX and BNDS.AX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and BetaShares.
Find the right allocation for IAF.AX and BNDS.AX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer