IFLN vs. IBHD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IFLN (Invesco Bloomberg Enhanced Fallen Angels ETF) and IBHD (iShares iBonds 2024 Term High Yield & Income ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - IFLN tracks the Bloomberg US High Yield Enhanced Fallen Angels Index while IBHD tracks the Bloomberg 2024 Term High Yield and Income Index. Both are passively managed. IFLN charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for IBHD.

Performance

IFLN vs. IBHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Bloomberg Enhanced Fallen Angels ETF (IFLN) and iShares iBonds 2024 Term High Yield & Income ETF (IBHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

IFLN

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 0.55%
• YTD: 0.57%
• 6M: 0.84%
• 1Y: 5.87%
• 3Y*: 7.32%
• 5Y*: 3.59%
• 10Y*: 4.60%

IBHD

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFLN vs. IBHD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
IFLN Invesco Bloomberg Enhanced Fallen Angels ETF	-0.28%
IBHD iShares iBonds 2024 Term High Yield & Income ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

IFLN vs. IBHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IFLN

IFLN Risk / Return Rank: 40
IFLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
IFLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
IFLN Omega Ratio Rank: 46
IFLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
IFLN Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFLN vs. IBHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Enhanced Fallen Angels ETF (IFLN) and iShares iBonds 2024 Term High Yield & Income ETF (IBHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IFLN	IBHD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.20	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.44	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.93	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IFLN	IBHD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.52	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	—	—

Drawdowns

IFLN vs. IBHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFLN drawdown since its inception was -44.79%, which is greater than IBHD's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFLN and IBHD.

Drawdown Indicators

	IFLN	IBHD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.79%	0.00%	-44.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.08%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.08%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.76%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.49%	0.00%	-0.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.33%	0.00%	-4.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.99%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	IFLN	IBHD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.26%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.17%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.90%	0.00%	+3.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.37%	0.00%	+6.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.89%	0.00%	+6.89%

IFLN vs. IBHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFLN has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than IBHD's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

IFLN vs. IBHD - Dividend Comparison

IFLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%, while IBHD has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IBHD iShares iBonds 2024 Term High Yield & Income ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IFLN Invesco Bloomberg Enhanced Fallen Angels ETF	5.82%	5.48%	5.69%	4.68%	3.52%	3.37%	3.90%	4.03%	4.44%	4.14%	4.58%	4.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, IFLN or IBHD?

On fees, IFLN is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IFLN or IBHD?

IFLN is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IBHD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IFLN or IBHD?

IFLN has the higher dividend yield at 5.82%, compared with 0.00% for IBHD.

What is the main difference between IFLN and IBHD?

IFLN tracks Bloomberg US High Yield Enhanced Fallen Angels Index, while IBHD tracks Bloomberg 2024 Term High Yield and Income Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for IFLN and 0.35% for IBHD.