IFLN vs. BSJQ
IFLN (Invesco Bloomberg Enhanced Fallen Angels ETF) and BSJQ (Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds from Invesco - IFLN tracks the Bloomberg US High Yield Enhanced Fallen Angels Index while BSJQ tracks the NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2026 TR Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IFLN returned 3.59%/yr vs 3.74%/yr for BSJQ. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IFLN charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for BSJQ.
Performance
IFLN vs. BSJQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IFLN achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly lower than BSJQ's 0.85% return.
IFLN
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 0.57%
- 6M
- 0.84%
- 1Y
- 5.87%
- 3Y*
- 7.32%
- 5Y*
- 3.59%
- 10Y*
- 4.60%
BSJQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 1.28%
- 1Y
- 4.62%
- 3Y*
- 6.94%
- 5Y*
- 3.74%
- 10Y*
- —
IFLN vs. BSJQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFLN Invesco Bloomberg Enhanced Fallen Angels ETF | 0.57% | 8.75% | 5.54% | 11.19% | -8.77% | 3.32% | 5.20% | 13.59% | -2.79% |
BSJQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF | 0.85% | 6.59% | 7.49% | 9.83% | -7.35% | 4.53% | 2.80% | 16.74% | -4.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between IFLN and BSJQ is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2018 | 0.82 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IFLN and BSJQ has dropped to 0.60 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IFLN vs. BSJQ — Risk / Return Rank
IFLN
BSJQ
IFLN vs. BSJQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Bloomberg Enhanced Fallen Angels ETF (IFLN) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF (BSJQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IFLN | BSJQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.76 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | 8.57 | -7.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.93 | 41.55 | -35.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IFLN | BSJQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | 3.35 | -1.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.66 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.54 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
IFLN vs. BSJQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFLN drawdown since its inception was -44.79%, which is greater than BSJQ's maximum drawdown of -24.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFLN and BSJQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IFLN | BSJQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.79% | -24.13% | -20.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.08% | -0.54% | -3.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.08% | -2.66% | -1.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.76% | -11.95% | -1.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.52% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -0.43% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.33% | -2.17% | -2.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 0.11% | +0.88% |
Volatility
IFLN vs. BSJQ - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Bloomberg Enhanced Fallen Angels ETF (IFLN) has a higher volatility of 1.26% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF (BSJQ) at 0.54%. This indicates that IFLN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSJQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IFLN | BSJQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.26% | 0.54% | +0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.17% | 0.98% | +2.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.90% | 1.38% | +2.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.37% | 5.73% | +0.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.89% | 8.45% | -1.56% |
IFLN vs. BSJQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFLN has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than BSJQ's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
IFLN vs. BSJQ - Dividend Comparison
IFLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%, which matches BSJQ's 5.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF | 5.83% | 6.10% | 6.58% | 6.58% | 5.58% | 4.27% | 4.64% | 4.59% | 2.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IFLN Invesco Bloomberg Enhanced Fallen Angels ETF | 5.82% | 5.48% | 5.69% | 4.68% | 3.52% | 3.37% | 3.90% | 4.03% | 4.44% | 4.14% | 4.58% | 4.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IFLN and BSJQ have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IFLN has higher volatility (1.26%) compared to BSJQ (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFLN dropped -44.79% vs BSJQ's -24.13%.
On 5-year performance, BSJQ leads with 3.74% vs 3.59% for IFLN. On fees, IFLN is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, BSJQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BSJQ has performed better with a 3.74% return vs 3.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IFLN is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJQ.
IFLN and BSJQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 5.82%.
IFLN tracks Bloomberg US High Yield Enhanced Fallen Angels Index, while BSJQ tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2026 TR Index. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for IFLN and 0.42% for BSJQ.
BSJQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IFLN and BSJQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer