PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IFFF.L vs. PAJS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IFFF.L vs. PAJS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF (IFFF.L) and Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (PAJS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFFF.L achieves a 26.52% return, which is significantly lower than PAJS.L's 10,649.95% return.


IFFF.L

1D
-1.56%
1M
-7.37%
6M
16.48%
YTD
26.52%
1Y
47.83%
3Y*
22.82%
5Y*
7.65%
10Y*
9.54%

PAJS.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.92%
6M
2.91%
YTD
10,649.95%
1Y
21.08%
3Y*
8.74%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFFF.L vs. PAJS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IFFF.L
iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF
26.52%30.77%13.56%-4.04%-12.39%-0.43%
PAJS.L
Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc
10,649.95%-98.87%0.76%8.67%-13.67%-28.63%

Correlation

The correlation between IFFF.L and PAJS.L is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2021

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IFFF.L vs. PAJS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IFFF.L
IFFF.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
IFFF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFFF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFFF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IFFF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFFF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

PAJS.L
PAJS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
PAJS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAJS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAJS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
PAJS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAJS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFFF.L vs. PAJS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF (IFFF.L) and Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (PAJS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IFFF.LPAJS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-280.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

89.52

-88.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.90

0.21

+3.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.81

0.47

+11.34

IFFF.L vs. PAJS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IFFF.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the PAJS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFFF.L and PAJS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IFFF.L vs. PAJS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFFF.L drawdown since its inception was -72.71%, smaller than the maximum PAJS.L drawdown of -99.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFFF.L and PAJS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IFFF.LPAJS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.71%

-99.32%

+26.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.19%

-99.06%

+86.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.69%

-99.06%

+79.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.19%

-17.87%

+5.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.53%

-35.69%

+12.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.04%

48.77%

-44.73%

Volatility

IFFF.L vs. PAJS.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF (IFFF.L) has a higher volatility of 10.82% compared to Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (PAJS.L) at 7.40%. This indicates that IFFF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAJS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IFFF.LPAJS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.82%

7.40%

+3.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.01%

1,130.17%

-1,110.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.63%

27,873.19%

-27,850.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.89%

13,113.62%

-13,093.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.39%

13,113.62%

-13,094.23%

IFFF.L vs. PAJS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFFF.L has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than PAJS.L's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

IFFF.L vs. PAJS.L - Dividend Comparison

IFFF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, while PAJS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IFFF.L
iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF
1.11%1.45%1.80%1.88%2.10%1.36%1.19%1.75%1.98%1.54%1.77%2.22%
PAJS.L
Invesco MSCI Japan ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IFFF.L and PAJS.L have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PAJS.L is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PAJS.L is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IFFF.L.

IFFF.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while PAJS.L is Japan Equities. IFFF.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD, while PAJS.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IFFF.L and 0.19% for PAJS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IFFF.L and PAJS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer