PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IFFF.L vs. XKS2.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IFFF.L vs. XKS2.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IFFF.L (iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF) and XKS2.L (Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - IFFF.L tracks the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD while XKS2.L tracks the MSCI Korea NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IFFF.L returned 12.33%/yr vs 18.77%/yr for XKS2.L. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IFFF.L charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for XKS2.L.

Performance

IFFF.L vs. XKS2.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF (IFFF.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C (XKS2.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFFF.L achieves a 40.09% return, which is significantly lower than XKS2.L's 117.88% return. Over the past 10 years, IFFF.L has underperformed XKS2.L with an annualized return of 12.33%, while XKS2.L has yielded a comparatively higher 18.77% annualized return.

IFFF.L

1D
-0.91%
1M
14.72%
YTD
40.09%
6M
42.35%
1Y
79.20%
3Y*
26.12%
5Y*
9.68%
10Y*
12.33%

XKS2.L

1D
-0.40%
1M
31.66%
YTD
117.88%
6M
136.19%
1Y
262.27%
3Y*
47.56%
5Y*
21.08%
10Y*
18.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFFF.L vs. XKS2.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IFFF.L
iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF		40.09%30.76%13.56%-4.04%-12.39%-8.11%21.66%13.62%-10.17%28.81%
XKS2.L
Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C		117.88%85.79%-21.66%13.44%-19.57%-7.21%38.65%7.36%-16.54%32.58%

Correlation

The correlation between IFFF.L and XKS2.L is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2007

0.70

The correlation between IFFF.L and XKS2.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

IFFF.L vs. XKS2.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IFFF.L
XKS2.L

Technology

49.8%
56.0%

Financial Services

15.3%
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%
5.7%

Industrials

7.3%
18.7%

Communication Services

7.0%
2.6%

Basic Materials

2.5%
2.0%

Healthcare

2.2%
3.0%

Real Estate

1.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.7%
1.4%

Energy

1.4%
1.1%

Utilities

1.4%
0.4%

Technology

IFFF.L
49.8%
XKS2.L
56.0%

Financial Services

IFFF.L
15.3%
XKS2.L
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

IFFF.L
9.7%
XKS2.L
5.7%

Industrials

IFFF.L
7.3%
XKS2.L
18.7%

Communication Services

IFFF.L
7.0%
XKS2.L
2.6%

Basic Materials

IFFF.L
2.5%
XKS2.L
2.0%

Healthcare

IFFF.L
2.2%
XKS2.L
3.0%

Real Estate

IFFF.L
1.7%
XKS2.L

-

Consumer Defensive

IFFF.L
1.7%
XKS2.L
1.4%

Energy

IFFF.L
1.4%
XKS2.L
1.1%

Utilities

IFFF.L
1.4%
XKS2.L
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF

Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C

Often compared with IFFF.L:
IFFF.L vs. XDEW.DEIFFF.L vs. VOOIFFF.L vs. VFEA.DEIFFF.L vs. IKOR.LIFFF.L vs. ASDV.LIFFF.L vs. CP9U.LIFFF.L vs. CP9G.L
Often compared with XKS2.L:
XKS2.L vs. LDAG.LXKS2.L vs. HMXD.LXKS2.L vs. AUAD.LXKS2.L vs. UB20.LXKS2.L vs. APEX.LXKS2.L vs. FLRK.LXKS2.L vs. PADV.L

Return for Risk

IFFF.L vs. XKS2.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IFFF.L
IFFF.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
IFFF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFFF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFFF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
IFFF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFFF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
XKS2.L
XKS2.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
XKS2.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XKS2.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
XKS2.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
XKS2.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
XKS2.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFFF.L vs. XKS2.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF (IFFF.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C (XKS2.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

IFFF.LXKS2.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
4.12
7.16

-3.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
5.02
6.33

-1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.73

1.93

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.63

12.21

-4.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.86

43.37

-18.51

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IFFF.L vs. XKS2.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IFFF.L Sharpe Ratio is 4.12, which is lower than the XKS2.L Sharpe Ratio of 7.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFFF.L and XKS2.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

IFFF.LXKS2.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.12

7.16

-3.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

0.84

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.77

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.39

+0.07

Drawdowns

IFFF.L vs. XKS2.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFFF.L drawdown since its inception was -53.09%, smaller than the maximum XKS2.L drawdown of -62.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFFF.L and XKS2.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IFFF.LXKS2.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.09%

-62.63%

+9.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.33%

-21.33%

+11.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.69%

-28.70%

+9.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.37%

-40.70%

+6.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.63%

-44.01%

+4.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

-0.40%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.36%

-15.76%

+3.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.18%

6.02%

-2.84%

Volatility

IFFF.L vs. XKS2.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF (IFFF.L) is 8.45%, while Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C (XKS2.L) has a volatility of 17.16%. This indicates that IFFF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XKS2.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IFFF.LXKS2.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.45%

17.16%

-8.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.86%

31.60%

-15.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.16%

36.40%

-17.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.14%

25.07%

-5.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.07%

24.31%

-5.24%

IFFF.L vs. XKS2.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFFF.L has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than XKS2.L's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

IFFF.L vs. XKS2.L - Dividend Comparison

IFFF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, while XKS2.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IFFF.L
iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF		1.04%1.45%1.80%1.88%2.10%1.36%1.19%1.75%1.98%1.54%1.77%2.22%
XKS2.L
Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

IFFF.L and XKS2.L have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XKS2.L is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XKS2.L is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IFFF.L.

IFFF.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD, while XKS2.L tracks MSCI Korea NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IFFF.L and 0.65% for XKS2.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IFFF.L and XKS2.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer