IFFF.L vs. MPXG.L
IFFF.L (iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF) and MPXG.L (Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR GBP (D)) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - IFFF.L tracks the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD while MPXG.L tracks the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IFFF.L returned 25.44%/yr vs 3.89%/yr for MPXG.L. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IFFF.L charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MPXG.L.
Performance
IFFF.L vs. MPXG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IFFF.L achieves a 37.38% return, which is significantly higher than MPXG.L's 2.07% return.
IFFF.L
- 1D
- -1.94%
- 1M
- 9.15%
- YTD
- 37.38%
- 6M
- 39.78%
- 1Y
- 73.61%
- 3Y*
- 25.44%
- 5Y*
- 9.26%
- 10Y*
- 11.86%
MPXG.L
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -3.47%
- YTD
- 2.07%
- 6M
- 1.90%
- 1Y
- 4.17%
- 3Y*
- 3.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IFFF.L vs. MPXG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFFF.L iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF | 37.38% | 30.76% | 13.56% | -4.04% | 1.13% |
MPXG.L Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) | 2.07% | 5.53% | 2.02% | -1.23% | 1.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between IFFF.L and MPXG.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2022 | 0.43 |
The correlation between IFFF.L and MPXG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IFFF.L vs. MPXG.L — Risk / Return Rank
IFFF.L
MPXG.L
IFFF.L vs. MPXG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF (IFFF.L) and Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (MPXG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IFFF.L | MPXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.67 | 1.07 | +0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.09 | 0.59 | +6.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.07 | 1.49 | +21.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IFFF.L | MPXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.81 | 0.38 | +3.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.26 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
IFFF.L vs. MPXG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFFF.L drawdown since its inception was -53.09%, which is greater than MPXG.L's maximum drawdown of -16.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFFF.L and MPXG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IFFF.L | MPXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.09% | -16.94% | -36.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.33% | -7.42% | -2.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.69% | -15.75% | -3.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.83% | -6.14% | +3.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.36% | -5.30% | -7.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.18% | 2.87% | +0.31% |
Volatility
IFFF.L vs. MPXG.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF (IFFF.L) has a higher volatility of 8.45% compared to Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (MPXG.L) at 3.79%. This indicates that IFFF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MPXG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IFFF.L | MPXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.45% | 3.79% | +4.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.02% | 9.17% | +6.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.26% | 11.43% | +7.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.16% | 14.91% | +4.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.08% | 14.91% | +4.17% |
IFFF.L vs. MPXG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFFF.L has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than MPXG.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
IFFF.L vs. MPXG.L - Dividend Comparison
IFFF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than MPXG.L's 3.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFFF.L iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF | 1.06% | 1.45% | 1.80% | 1.88% | 2.10% | 1.36% | 1.19% | 1.75% | 1.98% | 1.54% | 1.77% | 2.22% |
MPXG.L Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) | 3.17% | 3.24% | 3.36% | 3.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IFFF.L and MPXG.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MPXG.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MPXG.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IFFF.L.
IFFF.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD, while MPXG.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IFFF.L and 0.15% for MPXG.L.
Find the right allocation for IFFF.L and MPXG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer