IFFF.L vs. DXJA.L
IFFF.L (iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF) and DXJA.L (WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - IFFF.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD, while DXJA.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity UCITS Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IFFF.L returned 7.65%/yr vs 27.87%/yr for DXJA.L. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IFFF.L charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for DXJA.L.
Performance
IFFF.L vs. DXJA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IFFF.L is traded in GBp, while DXJA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the DXJA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IFFF.L achieves a 26.52% return, which is significantly higher than DXJA.L's 23.02% return.
IFFF.L
- 1D
- -1.56%
- 1M
- -7.37%
- 6M
- 16.48%
- YTD
- 26.52%
- 1Y
- 47.83%
- 3Y*
- 22.82%
- 5Y*
- 7.65%
- 10Y*
- 9.54%
DXJA.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 13.13%
- YTD
- 23.02%
- 1Y
- 56.28%
- 3Y*
- 31.64%
- 5Y*
- 27.87%
- 10Y*
- —
IFFF.L vs. DXJA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFFF.L iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF | 26.52% | 30.77% | 13.56% | -4.04% | -12.39% | -8.11% | 21.66% | 13.62% | -10.17% | 16.21% |
DXJA.L WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc | 23.02% | 23.95% | 31.19% | 34.18% | 18.87% | 18.46% | 1.41% | 13.02% | -14.13% | 6.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between IFFF.L and DXJA.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2017 | 0.44 |
The correlation between IFFF.L and DXJA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (3 years) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IFFF.L vs. DXJA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IFFF.L
DXJA.L
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Technology
IFFF.L
DXJA.L
Financial Services
IFFF.L
DXJA.L
Consumer Cyclical
IFFF.L
DXJA.L
Industrials
IFFF.L
DXJA.L
Communication Services
IFFF.L
DXJA.L
Basic Materials
IFFF.L
DXJA.L
Healthcare
IFFF.L
DXJA.L
Consumer Defensive
IFFF.L
DXJA.L
Real Estate
IFFF.L
DXJA.L
-
Energy
IFFF.L
DXJA.L
Utilities
IFFF.L
DXJA.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IFFF.L vs. DXJA.L — Risk / Return Rank
IFFF.L
DXJA.L
IFFF.L vs. DXJA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF (IFFF.L) and WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (DXJA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IFFF.L | DXJA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.48 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.90 | 6.11 | -2.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.81 | 19.34 | -7.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IFFF.L vs. DXJA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IFFF.L drawdown since its inception was -72.71%, which is greater than DXJA.L's maximum drawdown of -31.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFFF.L and DXJA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IFFF.L | DXJA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.71% | -31.73% | -40.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.19% | -9.16% | -3.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.69% | -22.58% | +2.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.46% | -22.58% | -9.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.19% | -3.39% | -8.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.53% | -5.69% | -17.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.04% | 2.90% | +1.14% |
Volatility
IFFF.L vs. DXJA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF (IFFF.L) has a higher volatility of 10.82% compared to WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc (DXJA.L) at 5.84%. This indicates that IFFF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXJA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IFFF.L | DXJA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.82% | 5.84% | +4.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.01% | 16.25% | +3.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.63% | 20.43% | +2.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.89% | 20.00% | -0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.39% | 20.13% | -0.74% |
IFFF.L vs. DXJA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IFFF.L has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than DXJA.L's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
IFFF.L vs. DXJA.L - Dividend Comparison
IFFF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.11%, while DXJA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXJA.L WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD Hedged Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IFFF.L iShares MSCI AC Far East ex-Japan UCITS ETF | 1.11% | 1.45% | 1.80% | 1.88% | 2.10% | 1.36% | 1.19% | 1.75% | 1.98% | 1.54% | 1.77% | 2.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IFFF.L and DXJA.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DXJA.L is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DXJA.L is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IFFF.L.
IFFF.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while DXJA.L is Japan Equities. IFFF.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD, while DXJA.L tracks WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity UCITS Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for IFFF.L and 0.48% for DXJA.L.
Find the right allocation for IFFF.L and DXJA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer