PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IFED vs. XTAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IFED vs. XTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFED achieves a -3.52% return, which is significantly lower than XTAP's 10.96% return.


IFED

1D
-1.24%
1M
4.85%
YTD
-3.52%
6M
-3.51%
1Y
1.97%
3Y*
16.71%
5Y*
10Y*

XTAP

1D
-0.21%
1M
2.32%
YTD
10.96%
6M
12.10%
1Y
21.00%
3Y*
17.90%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFED vs. XTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IFED
ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN
-3.52%15.02%23.04%20.78%-1.46%8.46%
XTAP
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF
10.96%17.58%14.26%23.46%-14.68%3.50%

Correlation

The correlation between IFED and XTAP is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2021

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between IFED and XTAP has dropped to 0.57 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IFED vs. XTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IFED
IFED Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
IFED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFED Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFED Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
IFED Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFED Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

XTAP
XTAP Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFED vs. XTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IFEDXTAPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

2.22

-1.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.14

14.82

-14.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.34

78.70

-78.36

IFED vs. XTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IFED Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the XTAP Sharpe Ratio of 4.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFED and XTAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IFEDXTAPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

4.50

-4.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.80

-0.16

Drawdowns

IFED vs. XTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFED drawdown since its inception was -22.36%, roughly equal to the maximum XTAP drawdown of -22.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFED and XTAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IFEDXTAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.36%

-22.13%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.65%

-1.42%

-13.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.36%

-11.83%

-10.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.50%

-0.21%

-5.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.84%

-3.45%

-2.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.75%

0.27%

+5.48%

Volatility

IFED vs. XTAP - Volatility Comparison

ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) has a higher volatility of 4.50% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF (XTAP) at 1.10%. This indicates that IFED's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IFEDXTAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.50%

1.10%

+3.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.86%

3.16%

+9.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.21%

4.70%

+11.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.88%

14.54%

+5.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.88%

14.41%

+5.47%

IFED vs. XTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFED has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than XTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

IFED vs. XTAP - Dividend Comparison

Neither IFED nor XTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IFED and XTAP have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IFED has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to XTAP (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFED dropped -22.36% vs XTAP's -22.13%.

On 3-year performance, XTAP leads with 17.90% vs 16.71% for IFED. On fees, IFED is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, XTAP has been the lower-risk option at 1.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, XTAP has performed better with a 17.90% return vs 16.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IFED is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XTAP.

IFED and XTAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: UBS and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for IFED and 0.79% for XTAP.

XTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.50 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IFED and XTAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer