PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IFED vs. SLVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IFED vs. SLVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) and UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN (SLVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFED achieves a 6.57% return, which is significantly higher than SLVO's -2.43% return.


IFED

1D
0.00%
1M
10.34%
6M
12.77%
YTD
6.57%
1Y
9.27%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.61%

SLVO

1D
2.23%
1M
-0.97%
6M
-5.92%
YTD
-2.43%
1Y
30.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
27.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$121.94K$80.88K$45.76K
$28.00M$15.87M$13.53M

IFED vs. SLVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IFED
ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN
6.57%15.02%9.46%
SLVO
UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN
-2.43%71.20%0.94%

Correlation

The correlation between IFED and SLVO is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2024

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IFED vs. SLVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IFED
IFED Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
IFED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFED Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFED Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
IFED Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFED Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

SLVO
SLVO Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
SLVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLVO Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SLVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLVO Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IFED vs. SLVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) and UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN (SLVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IFEDSLVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.20

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.46

1.38

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.43

3.86

-2.43

IFED vs. SLVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IFED Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the SLVO Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFED and SLVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IFED vs. SLVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFED drawdown since its inception was -22.36%, roughly equal to the maximum SLVO drawdown of -22.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFED and SLVO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IFEDSLVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.36%

-22.21%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.18%

-22.21%

+2.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.51%

-16.79%

+6.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.85%

-4.11%

-1.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.50%

7.91%

-1.41%

Volatility

IFED vs. SLVO - Volatility Comparison

ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) has a higher volatility of 24.37% compared to UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN (SLVO) at 9.98%. This indicates that IFED's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IFEDSLVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.37%

9.98%

+14.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.12%

28.31%

-0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.47%

33.51%

-4.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.59%

26.76%

-4.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.59%

26.76%

-4.17%

IFED vs. SLVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFED has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than SLVO's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

IFED vs. SLVO - Dividend Comparison

IFED has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SLVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 71.63%.


PositionTTM20252024
IFED
ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%
SLVO
UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN
71.63%19.35%14.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


IFED and SLVO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IFED has higher volatility (24.37%) compared to SLVO (9.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFED dropped -22.36% vs SLVO's -22.21%.

On 1-year performance, SLVO leads with 30.47% vs 9.27% for IFED. On fees, IFED is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, SLVO has been the lower-risk option at 9.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SLVO has performed better with a 30.47% return vs 9.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IFED is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SLVO.

SLVO has the higher dividend yield at 71.63%, compared with 0.00% for IFED.

IFED is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SLVO is Silver. IFED tracks IFED Large-Cap US Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SLVO tracks Credit Suisse NASDAQ Silver FLOWS 106 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for IFED and 0.65% for SLVO.

SLVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IFED and SLVO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer