PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IFED vs. NTSD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IFED vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


IFED

1D
-1.24%
1M
4.85%
YTD
-3.52%
6M
-3.51%
1Y
1.97%
3Y*
16.71%
5Y*
10Y*

NTSD

1D
-1.11%
1M
7.13%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IFED vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IFED and NTSD is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IFED vs. NTSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IFED
IFED Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
IFED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFED Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFED Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
IFED Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFED Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSD
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IFED vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IFEDNTSDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.34

IFED vs. NTSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IFEDNTSDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

5.08

-4.43

Drawdowns

IFED vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFED drawdown since its inception was -22.36%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFED and NTSD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IFEDNTSDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.36%

-5.20%

-17.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.50%

-1.11%

-4.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.84%

-0.84%

-5.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.75%

Volatility

IFED vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IFEDNTSDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.21%

24.28%

-8.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.88%

24.28%

-4.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.88%

24.28%

-4.40%

IFED vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFED has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

IFED vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison

Neither IFED nor NTSD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IFED and NTSD have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for IFED.

IFED and NTSD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: UBS and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for IFED and 0.35% for NTSD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IFED and NTSD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer