PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IFED vs. BITI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IFED vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IFED achieves a 10.03% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 27.11% return.


IFED

1D
0.00%
1M
13.92%
6M
14.63%
YTD
10.03%
1Y
14.76%
3Y*
18.74%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.40%

BITI

1D
3.01%
1M
-2.58%
6M
22.77%
YTD
27.11%
1Y
58.64%
3Y*
-31.77%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-35.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$24.10M$26.49M$38.71M
$159.79K$83.84K$44.71K

IFED vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IFED
ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN
10.03%15.02%23.04%20.78%10.88%
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
27.11%-1.76%-62.60%-66.17%3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between IFED and BITI is -0.38, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2022

-0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IFED vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IFED
IFED Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
IFED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFED Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFED Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
IFED Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFED Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

BITI
BITI Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IFED vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IFEDBITIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.24

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

2.53

-1.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.01

6.17

-4.17

IFED vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IFED Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IFED and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IFED vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IFED drawdown since its inception was -22.36%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IFED and BITI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IFEDBITIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.36%

-92.16%

+69.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.18%

-25.28%

+5.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.36%

-84.63%

+62.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.61%

-86.12%

+78.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.85%

-68.59%

+62.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.43%

10.35%

-3.92%

Volatility

IFED vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) has a higher volatility of 24.07% compared to ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) at 9.13%. This indicates that IFED's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IFEDBITIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.07%

9.13%

+14.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.96%

33.31%

-5.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.34%

44.23%

-14.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.56%

52.03%

-29.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.56%

52.03%

-29.47%

IFED vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IFED has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

IFED vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

IFED has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.30%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BITI
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF
15.17%1.60%3.91%3.33%0.06%
IFED
ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IFED and BITI have a correlation of -0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IFED has higher volatility (24.07%) compared to BITI (9.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IFED dropped -22.36% vs BITI's -92.16%.

On 3-year performance, IFED leads with 18.74% vs -31.77% for BITI. On fees, IFED is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, BITI has been the lower-risk option at 9.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, IFED has performed better with a 18.74% return vs -31.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IFED is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.17%, compared with 0.00% for IFED.

IFED is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. IFED tracks IFED Large-Cap US Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while BITI tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for IFED and 1.03% for BITI.

BITI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IFED and BITI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer