IEZ vs. BKGI

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

IEZ (iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF) and BKGI (Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IEZ is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Oil Equipment & Services Index, while BKGI is a Infrastructure Equities fund actively managed by BNY Mellon. IEZ is passively managed, while BKGI is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, IEZ returned 7.53%/yr vs 21.99%/yr for BKGI. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. IEZ charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BKGI.

Performance

IEZ vs. BKGI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF (IEZ) and Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEZ achieves a 35.92% return, which is significantly higher than BKGI's 13.50% return.

IEZ

• 1D: 2.54%
• 1M: 9.13%
• 6M: 8.39%
• YTD: 35.92%
• 1Y: 63.51%
• 3Y*: 7.53%
• 5Y*: 18.66%
• 10Y*: -1.17%
• ALL TIME*: -1.80%

BKGI

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: 0.90%
• 6M: 8.37%
• YTD: 13.50%
• 1Y: 17.71%
• 3Y*: 21.99%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 21.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BKGI Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF	$16.98M	$14.73M	$11.61M
IEZ iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF	$3.10M	$5.32M	$13.27M

IEZ vs. BKGI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
IEZ iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF	35.92%	7.51%	-8.15%	4.43%	5.84%
BKGI Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF	13.50%	37.53%	12.35%	9.72%	8.54%

Correlation

The correlation between IEZ and BKGI is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2022	0.37

IEZ vs. BKGI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IEZ	BKGI
Energy	99.1%	21.1%
Utilities	1.0%	46.0%
Industrials	0.9%	11.5%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	2.5%
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	19.0%
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

IEZ vs. BKGI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IEZ

IEZ Risk / Return Rank: 78
IEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
IEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
IEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 76
IEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
IEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 69

BKGI

BKGI Risk / Return Rank: 61
BKGI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
BKGI Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
BKGI Omega Ratio Rank: 56
BKGI Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
BKGI Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IEZ vs. BKGI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF (IEZ) and Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IEZ	BKGI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.23	1.54	+0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.87	2.17	+0.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.28	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.14	2.89	+0.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.47	8.59	+0.88

IEZ vs. BKGI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is higher than the BKGI Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEZ and BKGI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IEZ vs. BKGI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEZ drawdown since its inception was -92.52%, which is greater than BKGI's maximum drawdown of -14.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEZ and BKGI.

Drawdown Indicators

	IEZ	BKGI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.52%	-14.79%	-77.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.34%	-6.16%	-14.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-40.25%	-11.37%	-28.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.25%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-88.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-55.14%	-2.41%	-52.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-48.31%	-2.54%	-45.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.73%	2.07%	+4.66%

Volatility

IEZ vs. BKGI - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF (IEZ) has a higher volatility of 8.13% compared to Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI) at 2.79%. This indicates that IEZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKGI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IEZ	BKGI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.13%	2.79%	+5.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.82%	9.52%	+11.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.61%	11.58%	+17.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.87%	13.94%	+21.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.46%	13.94%	+27.52%

IEZ vs. BKGI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEZ has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than BKGI's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

IEZ vs. BKGI - Dividend Comparison

IEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, less than BKGI's 2.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BKGI Bny Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF	2.91%	2.65%	4.55%	4.55%	0.53%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IEZ iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF	1.22%	1.87%	1.76%	0.97%	0.65%	1.20%	2.07%	2.28%	1.81%	3.42%	0.91%	2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IEZ and BKGI in my portfolio?

IEZ and BKGI have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IEZ or BKGI?

IEZ has higher volatility (8.13%) compared to BKGI (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEZ dropped -92.52% vs BKGI's -14.79%.

Which ETF is better, IEZ or BKGI?

On 3-year performance, BKGI leads with 21.99% vs 7.53% for IEZ. On fees, IEZ is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, BKGI has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IEZ or BKGI?

Over the 3-year period, BKGI has performed better with a 21.99% return vs 7.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IEZ or BKGI?

IEZ is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BKGI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IEZ or BKGI?

BKGI has the higher dividend yield at 2.91%, compared with 1.22% for IEZ.

What is the main difference between IEZ and BKGI?

IEZ is categorized as Energy Equities, while BKGI is Infrastructure Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IEZ and 0.65% for BKGI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IEZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.