PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEVD.DE vs. XNNV.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEVD.DE vs. XNNV.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IEVD.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNNV.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEVD.DE achieves a 58.66% return, which is significantly higher than XNNV.DE's 5.08% return.


IEVD.DE

1D
-1.86%
1M
18.11%
YTD
58.66%
6M
57.41%
1Y
88.40%
3Y*
23.68%
5Y*
13.50%
10Y*

XNNV.DE

1D
1.03%
1M
5.50%
YTD
5.08%
6M
3.47%
1Y
15.03%
3Y*
13.35%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEVD.DE vs. XNNV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IEVD.DE
iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
58.66%10.81%5.27%23.03%-8.87%
XNNV.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C
5.08%2.05%29.19%29.66%-13.17%

Correlation

The correlation between IEVD.DE and XNNV.DE is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2022

0.76

The correlation between IEVD.DE and XNNV.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEVD.DE vs. XNNV.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEVD.DE
IEVD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
IEVD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEVD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEVD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
IEVD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEVD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

XNNV.DE
XNNV.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
XNNV.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNNV.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNNV.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
XNNV.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNNV.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEVD.DE vs. XNNV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IEVD.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNNV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEVD.DEXNNV.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.18

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.17

1.01

+3.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.74

2.80

+6.94

IEVD.DE vs. XNNV.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEVD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is higher than the XNNV.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEVD.DE and XNNV.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEVD.DEXNNV.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71

1.03

+1.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.67

-0.06

Drawdowns

IEVD.DE vs. XNNV.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEVD.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.37%, which is greater than XNNV.DE's maximum drawdown of -25.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEVD.DE and XNNV.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEVD.DEXNNV.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.37%

-25.90%

-16.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.18%

-15.02%

-6.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.23%

-25.90%

-4.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.86%

-0.91%

-0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.27%

-6.64%

-3.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.09%

5.41%

+3.68%

Volatility

IEVD.DE vs. XNNV.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Electric Vehicles and Driving Technology UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IEVD.DE) has a higher volatility of 11.17% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNNV.DE) at 3.84%. This indicates that IEVD.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XNNV.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEVD.DEXNNV.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.17%

3.84%

+7.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.50%

10.61%

+8.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.58%

14.72%

+17.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.27%

18.07%

+6.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.27%

18.07%

+7.20%

IEVD.DE vs. XNNV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEVD.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XNNV.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

IEVD.DE vs. XNNV.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither IEVD.DE nor XNNV.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IEVD.DE and XNNV.DE have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XNNV.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XNNV.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IEVD.DE.

IEVD.DE tracks STOXX® Global Electric Vehicles & Driving Technology, while XNNV.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI Innovation Select ESG Screened 200. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IEVD.DE and 0.30% for XNNV.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEVD.DE and XNNV.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer