PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEV vs. EPOL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEV vs. EPOL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Europe ETF (IEV) and iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEV achieves a 10.21% return, which is significantly lower than EPOL's 22.62% return. Over the past 10 years, IEV has underperformed EPOL with an annualized return of 9.81%, while EPOL has yielded a comparatively higher 11.96% annualized return.


IEV

1D
-0.44%
1M
0.94%
6M
5.40%
YTD
10.21%
1Y
24.55%
3Y*
16.27%
5Y*
9.68%
10Y*
9.81%
ALL TIME*
5.31%

EPOL

1D
0.16%
1M
8.60%
6M
14.79%
YTD
22.62%
1Y
40.70%
3Y*
33.53%
5Y*
18.62%
10Y*
11.96%
ALL TIME*
6.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$18.30M$16.66M$16.43M
$9.58M$7.30M$8.64M

IEV vs. EPOL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEV
iShares Europe ETF
10.21%35.63%1.36%20.14%-14.24%16.73%4.07%24.03%-14.68%24.84%
EPOL
iShares MSCI Poland ETF
22.62%77.34%-2.61%50.70%-24.62%12.21%-8.38%-6.13%-13.76%52.43%

Correlation

The correlation between IEV and EPOL is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2010

0.71

The correlation between IEV and EPOL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

IEV vs. EPOL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IEV
EPOL

Financial Services

25.5%
45.7%

Industrials

18.1%
1.8%

Healthcare

12.8%
0.7%

Technology

9.2%
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

8.2%
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

6.5%
14.0%

Basic Materials

5.5%
7.1%

Energy

5.1%
13.2%

Utilities

4.7%
4.5%

Communication Services

3.2%
5.4%

Real Estate

0.6%

-

Financial Services

IEV
25.5%
EPOL
45.7%

Industrials

IEV
18.1%
EPOL
1.8%

Healthcare

IEV
12.8%
EPOL
0.7%

Technology

IEV
9.2%
EPOL
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

IEV
8.2%
EPOL
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IEV
6.5%
EPOL
14.0%

Basic Materials

IEV
5.5%
EPOL
7.1%

Energy

IEV
5.1%
EPOL
13.2%

Utilities

IEV
4.7%
EPOL
4.5%

Communication Services

IEV
3.2%
EPOL
5.4%

Real Estate

IEV
0.6%
EPOL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEV vs. EPOL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IEV
IEV Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
IEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEV Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
IEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEV Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

EPOL
EPOL Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
EPOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPOL Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
EPOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPOL Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IEV vs. EPOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Europe ETF (IEV) and iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IEVEPOLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.29

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

3.68

-1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.28

9.96

-2.68

IEV vs. EPOL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEV Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the EPOL Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEV and EPOL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IEV vs. EPOL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEV drawdown since its inception was -63.27%, roughly equal to the maximum EPOL drawdown of -63.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEV and EPOL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEVEPOLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.27%

-63.72%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

-11.04%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.63%

-19.56%

+4.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.60%

-54.21%

+23.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.62%

-61.41%

+24.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

0.00%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.96%

-26.64%

+11.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.29%

4.07%

-0.78%

Volatility

IEV vs. EPOL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Europe ETF (IEV) is 4.37%, while iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that IEV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPOL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEVEPOLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.37%

5.29%

-0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.80%

18.34%

-4.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.02%

23.12%

-7.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.65%

29.12%

-11.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.21%

27.42%

-9.21%

IEV vs. EPOL - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEV has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than EPOL's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

IEV vs. EPOL - Dividend Comparison

IEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, less than EPOL's 3.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPOL
iShares MSCI Poland ETF
3.44%4.78%6.04%2.87%2.65%1.33%1.44%2.51%1.44%1.88%2.14%2.53%
IEV
iShares Europe ETF
2.74%2.73%3.10%2.77%3.06%2.81%1.76%3.06%3.43%2.39%3.08%2.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


IEV and EPOL have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EPOL has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to IEV (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEV dropped -63.27% vs EPOL's -63.72%.

On 10-year performance, EPOL leads with 11.96% vs 9.81% for IEV. On fees, IEV is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, IEV has been the lower-risk option at 4.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EPOL has performed better with a 11.96% return vs 9.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IEV is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for EPOL.

EPOL has the higher dividend yield at 3.44%, compared with 2.74% for IEV.

IEV tracks S&P Europe 350 Index, while EPOL tracks MSCI Poland Investable Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for IEV and 0.61% for EPOL.

EPOL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEV and EPOL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer