IETH vs. TOAK
IETH (Bitwise Ethereum Option Income Strategy ETF) and TOAK (Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IETH is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Bitwise, while TOAK is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Twin Oak. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. IETH charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for TOAK.
Performance
IETH vs. TOAK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IETH achieves a -38.45% return, which is significantly lower than TOAK's 1.51% return.
IETH
- 1D
- -3.27%
- 1M
- -17.57%
- YTD
- -38.45%
- 6M
- -35.98%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TOAK
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 1.51%
- 6M
- 1.57%
- 1Y
- 3.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IETH vs. TOAK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IETH Bitwise Ethereum Option Income Strategy ETF | -38.45% | -27.34% |
TOAK Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF | 1.51% | 0.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between IETH and TOAK is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IETH vs. TOAK — Risk / Return Rank
IETH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TOAK
IETH vs. TOAK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Ethereum Option Income Strategy ETF (IETH) and Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF (TOAK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IETH | TOAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.77 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.04 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.27 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IETH vs. TOAK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IETH drawdown since its inception was -59.55%, which is greater than TOAK's maximum drawdown of -1.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IETH and TOAK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IETH | TOAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.55% | -1.81% | -57.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.45% | -1.53% | -55.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.29% | -0.15% | -38.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.59% | — |
Volatility
IETH vs. TOAK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IETH | TOAK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.11% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.74% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.54% | 2.91% | +57.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.54% | 2.19% | +58.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.54% | 2.19% | +58.35% |
IETH vs. TOAK - Expense Ratio Comparison
IETH has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than TOAK's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
IETH vs. TOAK - Dividend Comparison
IETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 50.52%, while TOAK has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
IETH Bitwise Ethereum Option Income Strategy ETF | 50.52% | 18.26% |
TOAK Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IETH and TOAK have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TOAK is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TOAK is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for IETH.
IETH has the higher dividend yield at 50.52%, compared with 0.00% for TOAK.
IETH is categorized as Derivative Income, while TOAK is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Twin Oak. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for IETH and 0.25% for TOAK.
Find the right allocation for IETH and TOAK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer