PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IETC vs. NOCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IETC vs. NOCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF (IETC) and Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October (NOCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IETC achieves a 13.88% return, which is significantly higher than NOCT's 7.61% return.


IETC

1D
-2.13%
1M
11.52%
YTD
13.88%
6M
12.87%
1Y
30.45%
3Y*
30.53%
5Y*
18.23%
10Y*

NOCT

1D
-0.12%
1M
2.54%
YTD
7.61%
6M
7.69%
1Y
17.36%
3Y*
14.98%
5Y*
10.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IETC vs. NOCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IETC
iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF
13.88%19.56%37.57%54.35%-32.78%29.73%46.59%13.00%
NOCT
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October
7.61%12.81%12.10%30.67%-13.42%12.10%11.64%5.54%

Correlation

The correlation between IETC and NOCT is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2019

0.86

The correlation between IETC and NOCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

IETC vs. NOCT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IETC
NOCT

Technology

79.1%
54.2%

Communication Services

8.4%
15.5%

Consumer Cyclical

4.7%
12.2%

Industrials

3.7%
2.8%

Financial Services

3.1%
0.2%

Real Estate

0.7%
0.1%

Healthcare

0.1%
4.2%

Basic Materials

-

1.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.6%

Energy

-

0.6%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Technology

IETC
79.1%
NOCT
54.2%

Communication Services

IETC
8.4%
NOCT
15.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IETC
4.7%
NOCT
12.2%

Industrials

IETC
3.7%
NOCT
2.8%

Financial Services

IETC
3.1%
NOCT
0.2%

Real Estate

IETC
0.7%
NOCT
0.1%

Healthcare

IETC
0.1%
NOCT
4.2%

Basic Materials

IETC

-

NOCT
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

IETC

-

NOCT
7.6%

Energy

IETC

-

NOCT
0.6%

Utilities

IETC

-

NOCT
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IETC vs. NOCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IETC
IETC Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
IETC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IETC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
IETC Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
IETC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
IETC Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

NOCT
NOCT Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
NOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
NOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IETC vs. NOCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF (IETC) and Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October (NOCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IETCNOCTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.46

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

2.99

-1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.06

13.90

-9.83

IETC vs. NOCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IETC Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the NOCT Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IETC and NOCT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IETCNOCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

2.31

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.96

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

1.01

-0.14

Drawdowns

IETC vs. NOCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IETC drawdown since its inception was -38.48%, which is greater than NOCT's maximum drawdown of -16.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IETC and NOCT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IETCNOCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.48%

-16.21%

-22.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.19%

-5.84%

-15.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.17%

-12.70%

-12.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.48%

-16.21%

-22.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.25%

-0.16%

-2.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.14%

-2.34%

-5.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.51%

1.25%

+6.26%

Volatility

IETC vs. NOCT - Volatility Comparison

iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF (IETC) has a higher volatility of 6.43% compared to Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October (NOCT) at 1.01%. This indicates that IETC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IETCNOCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.43%

1.01%

+5.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.49%

5.90%

+10.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.04%

7.55%

+13.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.53%

10.93%

+13.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.37%

11.19%

+14.18%

IETC vs. NOCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IETC has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than NOCT's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

IETC vs. NOCT - Dividend Comparison

IETC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, while NOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IETC
iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF
0.34%0.38%0.52%0.79%0.92%0.73%0.48%0.95%1.27%
NOCT
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.07%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IETC and NOCT have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IETC has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to NOCT (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IETC dropped -38.48% vs NOCT's -16.21%.

On 5-year performance, IETC leads with 18.23% vs 10.46% for NOCT. On fees, IETC is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, NOCT has been the lower-risk option at 1.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IETC has performed better with a 18.23% return vs 10.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IETC is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for NOCT.

IETC has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.00% for NOCT.

IETC is categorized as Technology Equities, while NOCT is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IETC and 0.79% for NOCT.

NOCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IETC and NOCT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer