IETC vs. FFTY

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

IETC (iShares U.S. Tech Independence Focused ETF) and FFTY (Innovator IBD 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IETC is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by iShares, while FFTY is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the IBD 50 Index. IETC is actively managed, while FFTY is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IETC returned 14.70%/yr vs -0.65%/yr for FFTY. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IETC charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FFTY.

Performance

IETC vs. FFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Tech Independence Focused ETF (IETC) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IETC achieves a 2.72% return, which is significantly lower than FFTY's 20.20% return.

IETC

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: -3.85%
• YTD: 2.72%
• 6M: 0.67%
• 1Y: 13.47%
• 3Y*: 25.41%
• 5Y*: 14.70%
• 10Y*: —

FFTY

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: 4.74%
• YTD: 20.20%
• 6M: 17.09%
• 1Y: 34.13%
• 3Y*: 21.01%
• 5Y*: -0.65%
• 10Y*: 7.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IETC vs. FFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
IETC iShares U.S. Tech Independence Focused ETF	2.72%	19.56%	37.57%	54.35%	-32.78%	29.73%	46.59%	43.09%	-3.75%
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF	20.20%	23.38%	18.36%	12.40%	-51.08%	11.92%	18.20%	25.74%	-18.88%

Correlation

The correlation between IETC and FFTY is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2018	0.76

The correlation between IETC and FFTY shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IETC vs. FFTY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IETC	FFTY
Technology	79.5%	39.4%
Communication Services	8.2%	2.8%
Industrials	4.3%	23.1%
Consumer Cyclical	4.2%	2.3%
Financial Services	3.0%	6.7%
Real Estate	0.6%	-
Healthcare	0.1%	12.8%
Basic Materials	-	2.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.8%
Energy	-	7.3%
Utilities	-	2.1%

Return for Risk

IETC vs. FFTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IETC

IETC Risk / Return Rank: 18
IETC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
IETC Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
IETC Omega Ratio Rank: 18
IETC Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
IETC Martin Ratio Rank: 17

FFTY

FFTY Risk / Return Rank: 29
FFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
FFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
FFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 28
FFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
FFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IETC vs. FFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Tech Independence Focused ETF (IETC) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IETC	FFTY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.59	0.95	-0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.93	1.37	-0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.18	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.64	1.47	-0.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.72	3.88	-2.15

IETC vs. FFTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IETC Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the FFTY Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IETC and FFTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IETC vs. FFTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IETC drawdown since its inception was -38.48%, smaller than the maximum FFTY drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IETC and FFTY.

Drawdown Indicators

	IETC	FFTY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.48%	-59.46%	+20.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.19%	-23.29%	+2.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.17%	-29.60%	+4.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.48%	-59.46%	+20.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-59.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.83%	-15.28%	+3.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.14%	-22.34%	+14.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.83%	8.82%	-0.99%

Volatility

IETC vs. FFTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Tech Independence Focused ETF (IETC) is 11.03%, while Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) has a volatility of 13.46%. This indicates that IETC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IETC	FFTY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.03%	13.46%	-2.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.18%	28.29%	-10.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.84%	36.00%	-13.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.86%	29.62%	-4.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.49%	27.66%	-2.17%

IETC vs. FFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

IETC has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

IETC vs. FFTY - Dividend Comparison

IETC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than FFTY's 1.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF	1.12%	1.35%	0.91%	0.65%	2.75%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.17%
IETC iShares U.S. Tech Independence Focused ETF	0.40%	0.38%	0.52%	0.79%	0.92%	0.73%	0.48%	0.95%	1.27%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IETC and FFTY in my portfolio?

IETC and FFTY have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IETC or FFTY?

FFTY has higher volatility (13.46%) compared to IETC (11.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IETC dropped -38.48% vs FFTY's -59.46%.

Which ETF is better, IETC or FFTY?

On 5-year performance, IETC leads with 14.70% vs -0.65% for FFTY. On fees, IETC is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IETC has been the lower-risk option at 11.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IETC or FFTY?

Over the 5-year period, IETC has performed better with a 14.70% return vs -0.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IETC or FFTY?

IETC is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IETC or FFTY?

FFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.40% for IETC.

What is the main difference between IETC and FFTY?

IETC is categorized as Technology Equities, while FFTY is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IETC and 0.80% for FFTY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.