IETC vs. ACWI
IETC (iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF) and ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IETC is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by iShares, while ACWI is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index. IETC is actively managed, while ACWI is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IETC returned 17.84%/yr vs 11.35%/yr for ACWI. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IETC charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWI.
Performance
IETC vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IETC having a 12.03% return and ACWI slightly higher at 12.47%.
IETC
- 1D
- -1.63%
- 1M
- 9.01%
- YTD
- 12.03%
- 6M
- 10.27%
- 1Y
- 27.98%
- 3Y*
- 29.91%
- 5Y*
- 17.84%
- 10Y*
- —
ACWI
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 4.45%
- YTD
- 12.47%
- 6M
- 13.07%
- 1Y
- 29.24%
- 3Y*
- 21.38%
- 5Y*
- 11.35%
- 10Y*
- 12.82%
IETC vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IETC iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF | 12.03% | 19.56% | 37.57% | 54.35% | -32.78% | 29.73% | 46.59% | 43.09% | -3.52% |
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 12.47% | 22.41% | 17.45% | 22.27% | -18.39% | 18.66% | 16.34% | 26.59% | -6.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between IETC and ACWI is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2018 | 0.84 |
The correlation between IETC and ACWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
IETC vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IETC
ACWI
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Financial Services
Real Estate
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
IETC
ACWI
Communication Services
IETC
ACWI
Consumer Cyclical
IETC
ACWI
Industrials
IETC
ACWI
Financial Services
IETC
ACWI
Real Estate
IETC
ACWI
Healthcare
IETC
ACWI
Basic Materials
IETC
-
ACWI
Consumer Defensive
IETC
-
ACWI
Energy
IETC
-
ACWI
Utilities
IETC
-
ACWI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IETC vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank
IETC
ACWI
IETC vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF (IETC) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IETC | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.42 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 3.02 | -1.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.73 | 13.55 | -9.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IETC | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 2.30 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.71 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 0.43 | +0.43 |
Drawdowns
IETC vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IETC drawdown since its inception was -38.48%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IETC and ACWI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IETC | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.48% | -56.00% | +17.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.19% | -9.73% | -11.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.17% | -16.55% | -8.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.48% | -26.42% | -12.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.84% | -0.53% | -3.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.13% | -8.61% | +0.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.51% | 2.16% | +5.35% |
Volatility
IETC vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison
iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF (IETC) has a higher volatility of 6.78% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) at 3.83%. This indicates that IETC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IETC | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.78% | 3.83% | +2.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.57% | 10.30% | +6.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.09% | 12.79% | +8.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.53% | 16.05% | +8.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.38% | 17.11% | +8.27% |
IETC vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IETC has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
IETC vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison
IETC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than ACWI's 1.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 1.38% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.43% | 2.33% | 2.18% | 1.94% | 2.19% | 2.56% |
IETC iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF | 0.35% | 0.38% | 0.52% | 0.79% | 0.92% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 0.95% | 1.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IETC and ACWI have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IETC has higher volatility (6.78%) compared to ACWI (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IETC dropped -38.48% vs ACWI's -56.00%.
On 5-year performance, IETC leads with 17.84% vs 11.35% for ACWI. On fees, IETC is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, ACWI has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IETC has performed better with a 17.84% return vs 11.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IETC is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.
ACWI has the higher dividend yield at 1.38%, compared with 0.35% for IETC.
IETC is categorized as Technology Equities, while ACWI is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for IETC and 0.32% for ACWI.
ACWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IETC and ACWI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer