IESG.L vs. SUSM.L
IESG.L (iShares MSCI Europe SRI UCITS ETF) and SUSM.L (iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IESG.L is a ESG fund tracking the MSCI Europe SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuel Index, while SUSM.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuel Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IESG.L returned 8.53%/yr vs 7.21%/yr for SUSM.L. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IESG.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SUSM.L.
Performance
IESG.L vs. SUSM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IESG.L is traded in GBp, while SUSM.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SUSM.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IESG.L achieves a 8.24% return, which is significantly lower than SUSM.L's 12.12% return. Over the past 10 years, IESG.L has outperformed SUSM.L with an annualized return of 8.53%, while SUSM.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.21% annualized return.
IESG.L
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.94%
- 6M
- 5.74%
- YTD
- 8.24%
- 1Y
- 9.94%
- 3Y*
- 8.02%
- 5Y*
- 5.23%
- 10Y*
- 8.53%
SUSM.L
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- -3.08%
- 6M
- 7.89%
- YTD
- 12.12%
- 1Y
- 27.69%
- 3Y*
- 13.51%
- 5Y*
- 4.24%
- 10Y*
- 7.21%
IESG.L vs. SUSM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IESG.L iShares MSCI Europe SRI UCITS ETF | 8.24% | 8.44% | 0.88% | 14.27% | -9.89% | 18.85% | 9.51% | 22.59% | -6.37% | 16.03% |
SUSM.L iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 12.12% | 22.81% | 6.59% | -3.89% | -8.63% | -0.11% | 15.53% | 10.51% | -4.95% | 23.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between IESG.L and SUSM.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2016 | 0.60 |
The correlation between IESG.L and SUSM.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IESG.L vs. SUSM.L — Risk / Return Rank
IESG.L
SUSM.L
IESG.L vs. SUSM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe SRI UCITS ETF (IESG.L) and iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUSM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IESG.L | SUSM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.26 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.87 | 2.59 | -1.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.89 | 7.91 | -5.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IESG.L vs. SUSM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IESG.L drawdown since its inception was -33.61%, which is greater than SUSM.L's maximum drawdown of -30.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IESG.L and SUSM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IESG.L | SUSM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.61% | -30.70% | -2.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.32% | -10.65% | -0.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.07% | -17.71% | +2.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.77% | -23.91% | +3.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.95% | -30.70% | +4.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.59% | -8.00% | +6.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.96% | -9.16% | +2.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.43% | 3.49% | -0.06% |
Volatility
IESG.L vs. SUSM.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Europe SRI UCITS ETF (IESG.L) is 3.49%, while iShares MSCI EM SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUSM.L) has a volatility of 8.41%. This indicates that IESG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SUSM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IESG.L | SUSM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.49% | 8.41% | -4.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.89% | 16.95% | -6.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.95% | 19.27% | -6.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.27% | 18.01% | -1.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.78% | 19.56% | -3.78% |
IESG.L vs. SUSM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IESG.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SUSM.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IESG.L vs. SUSM.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IESG.L nor SUSM.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IESG.L and SUSM.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IESG.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IESG.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SUSM.L.
IESG.L is categorized as ESG, while SUSM.L is Emerging Markets Equities. IESG.L tracks MSCI Europe SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuel Index, while SUSM.L tracks MSCI EM SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuel Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IESG.L and 0.25% for SUSM.L.
Find the right allocation for IESG.L and SUSM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer