PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEQD.L vs. UD03.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEQD.L vs. UD03.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Europe Quality Factor UCITS Dist (IEQD.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IEQD.L is traded in EUR, while UD03.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UD03.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEQD.L achieves a 4.24% return, which is significantly lower than UD03.L's 13.28% return.


IEQD.L

1D
0.53%
1M
1.23%
YTD
4.24%
6M
5.85%
1Y
6.61%
3Y*
7.76%
5Y*
5.90%
10Y*

UD03.L

1D
0.17%
1M
4.51%
YTD
13.28%
6M
16.24%
1Y
21.24%
3Y*
14.66%
5Y*
10.65%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEQD.L vs. UD03.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IEQD.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Quality Factor UCITS Dist
4.24%9.49%4.14%14.42%-11.20%26.21%1.53%-0.27%
UD03.L
UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
13.28%18.94%5.44%19.64%-6.99%19.59%-3.56%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between IEQD.L and UD03.L is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2019

0.23

Over the past year, IEQD.L and UD03.L have become more correlated (0.50) than their long-term average of 0.23, meaning their price movements have been converging.

IEQD.L vs. UD03.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IEQD.L
UD03.L

Financial Services

21.1%
28.5%

Industrials

19.5%
12.1%

Healthcare

14.2%
4.1%

Technology

10.8%
16.2%

Consumer Defensive

8.1%
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
7.0%

Basic Materials

5.6%
4.2%

Energy

5.2%
2.7%

Utilities

5.1%
7.7%

Communication Services

3.0%
3.1%

Real Estate

0.8%

-

Financial Services

IEQD.L
21.1%
UD03.L
28.5%

Industrials

IEQD.L
19.5%
UD03.L
12.1%

Healthcare

IEQD.L
14.2%
UD03.L
4.1%

Technology

IEQD.L
10.8%
UD03.L
16.2%

Consumer Defensive

IEQD.L
8.1%
UD03.L
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

IEQD.L
6.6%
UD03.L
7.0%

Basic Materials

IEQD.L
5.6%
UD03.L
4.2%

Energy

IEQD.L
5.2%
UD03.L
2.7%

Utilities

IEQD.L
5.1%
UD03.L
7.7%

Communication Services

IEQD.L
3.0%
UD03.L
3.1%

Real Estate

IEQD.L
0.8%
UD03.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEQD.L vs. UD03.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEQD.L
IEQD.L Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
IEQD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEQD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEQD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
IEQD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEQD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

UD03.L
UD03.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
UD03.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UD03.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
UD03.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
UD03.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
UD03.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEQD.L vs. UD03.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Quality Factor UCITS Dist (IEQD.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEQD.LUD03.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.52

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

5.56

-4.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.08

16.13

-14.05

IEQD.L vs. UD03.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEQD.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the UD03.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEQD.L and UD03.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEQD.LUD03.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

2.96

-2.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

1.63

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

1.02

-0.48

Drawdowns

IEQD.L vs. UD03.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEQD.L drawdown since its inception was -33.13%, smaller than the maximum UD03.L drawdown of -36.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEQD.L and UD03.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEQD.LUD03.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.13%

-36.77%

+3.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.51%

-8.71%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.74%

-13.75%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.89%

-19.79%

-0.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.91%

-1.09%

-0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.88%

-3.54%

-1.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

3.39%

-0.22%

Volatility

IEQD.L vs. UD03.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI Europe Quality Factor UCITS Dist (IEQD.L) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UD03.L) at 3.62%. This indicates that IEQD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UD03.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEQD.LUD03.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

3.62%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.69%

16.41%

-4.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.92%

29.22%

-15.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.34%

51.35%

-36.01%

IEQD.L vs. UD03.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEQD.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than UD03.L's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

IEQD.L vs. UD03.L - Dividend Comparison

IEQD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than UD03.L's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IEQD.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Quality Factor UCITS Dist
2.09%2.18%2.37%2.74%2.69%1.96%2.21%2.89%2.93%
UD03.L
UBS ETF (LU) Factor MSCI EMU Prime Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
2.54%2.97%2.84%3.67%3.96%3.50%2.07%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IEQD.L and UD03.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IEQD.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IEQD.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for UD03.L.

IEQD.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while UD03.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IEQD.L and 0.28% for UD03.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEQD.L and UD03.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer