PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEMU.L vs. PRUK.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEMU.L vs. PRUK.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares VII plc -iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IEMU.L) and Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IEMU.L is traded in USD, while PRUK.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the PRUK.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEMU.L achieves a 8.00% return, which is significantly higher than PRUK.L's 2.63% return.


IEMU.L

1D
0.59%
1M
0.86%
YTD
8.00%
6M
10.61%
1Y
19.54%
3Y*
19.32%
5Y*
9.61%
10Y*

PRUK.L

1D
1.05%
1M
2.55%
YTD
2.63%
6M
5.94%
1Y
8.86%
3Y*
11.73%
5Y*
-0.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEMU.L vs. PRUK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IEMU.L
iShares VII plc -iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
8.00%39.99%3.03%24.18%-17.17%13.22%15.72%
PRUK.L
Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D)
2.64%22.14%4.08%13.03%-31.01%11.93%29.58%

Correlation

The correlation between IEMU.L and PRUK.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2020

0.71

The correlation between IEMU.L and PRUK.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

IEMU.L vs. PRUK.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IEMU.L
PRUK.L

Financial Services

24.0%
19.9%

Industrials

21.0%
22.2%

Technology

15.9%
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
13.2%

Utilities

6.4%
3.4%

Healthcare

5.6%
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

5.6%
6.4%

Communication Services

4.3%
6.8%

Basic Materials

4.0%
7.3%

Energy

3.9%
2.9%

Real Estate

0.9%
8.0%

Financial Services

IEMU.L
24.0%
PRUK.L
19.9%

Industrials

IEMU.L
21.0%
PRUK.L
22.2%

Technology

IEMU.L
15.9%
PRUK.L
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IEMU.L
8.4%
PRUK.L
13.2%

Utilities

IEMU.L
6.4%
PRUK.L
3.4%

Healthcare

IEMU.L
5.6%
PRUK.L
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

IEMU.L
5.6%
PRUK.L
6.4%

Communication Services

IEMU.L
4.3%
PRUK.L
6.8%

Basic Materials

IEMU.L
4.0%
PRUK.L
7.3%

Energy

IEMU.L
3.9%
PRUK.L
2.9%

Real Estate

IEMU.L
0.9%
PRUK.L
8.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEMU.L vs. PRUK.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEMU.L
IEMU.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
IEMU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

PRUK.L
PRUK.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
PRUK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRUK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRUK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
PRUK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRUK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEMU.L vs. PRUK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares VII plc -iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IEMU.L) and Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEMU.LPRUK.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.11

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

0.57

+1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.85

1.91

+3.93

IEMU.L vs. PRUK.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEMU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is higher than the PRUK.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEMU.L and PRUK.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEMU.LPRUK.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

0.53

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

-0.01

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.34

+0.22

Drawdowns

IEMU.L vs. PRUK.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEMU.L drawdown since its inception was -38.74%, smaller than the maximum PRUK.L drawdown of -48.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMU.L and PRUK.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEMU.LPRUK.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.74%

-48.73%

+9.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.28%

-15.53%

+3.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.50%

-21.14%

+6.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.69%

-48.73%

+13.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-5.14%

+4.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.94%

-19.69%

+12.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

4.62%

-1.19%

Volatility

IEMU.L vs. PRUK.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares VII plc -iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (IEMU.L) and Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (PRUK.L) have volatilities of 5.66% and 5.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEMU.LPRUK.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.66%

5.54%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.14%

13.41%

+0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.96%

16.74%

+0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.30%

20.48%

-0.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.99%

21.50%

+0.49%

IEMU.L vs. PRUK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEMU.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than PRUK.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IEMU.L vs. PRUK.L - Dividend Comparison

IEMU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PRUK.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
IEMU.L
iShares VII plc -iShares Core MSCI EMU UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PRUK.L
Amundi Prime UK Mid and Small Cap UCITS ETF DR GBP (D)
3.60%3.70%3.63%3.43%3.50%1.73%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


IEMU.L and PRUK.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PRUK.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRUK.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for IEMU.L.

IEMU.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while PRUK.L tracks FTSE 250 Ex Investment Trust TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for IEMU.L and 0.05% for PRUK.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEMU.L and PRUK.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer